LET'S TAKE IT AS AXIOMATIC THAT WE CANNOT SEARCH FOR WHAT
IS NOT THERE. TO PORTRAY THIS THINK OF YOUR LIST OF IMAGES
ON YOUR ACCOUNT. WHEN AN IMAGE HAS NO UPVOTES THERE IS NO
INFORMATION PROVIDED. THAT MEANS SEARCHING FOR '0
UPVOTES' IS FUTILE. NOW MATHEMATICS AVOIDS THIS CONCERN
FOR INFINITE SETS WITH AN IDEA CALLED UNRESTRICTED
COMPREHENSION. THAT JUST MEANS ANY SETS WE CONSTRUCT OF
INFINITE THINGS MUST HAVE GREAT CARE TAKEN WE NEVER WANT
THERE TO BE ANY PROPERTIES THAT ARE NOT WELL DEFINED.
HOWEVER THERE IS A WAY TO VIEW OUR OCCURRENCE OF
INFORMATIONLESS PROPERTIES THAT SHOWS SOMETHING HAS NOT
BEEN WELL CONSTRUCTED BY SET THEORISTS. WE EXPECT INFINITE STRINGS OF ZERO'S TO HAVE AS MUCH
INFORMATION LACKING FROM THEIR BIT REPRESENTATION AS
FINITE STRINGS. THIS TURNS OUT TO NOT BE THE CASE; TO QUIP
WHERE SET THEORIST SAY SOME INFINITES ARE GREATER THAN
OTHERS†, IT IS ALSO THE CASE THAT SOME EMPTINESS ARE
LESSER THAN OTHERS. THIS IS ARGUED FROM A BASIC PREMISE
OF INFORMATION THEORY. THAT PREMISE IS THAT THE MORE
UNIFORM A STRING OF BITS THE LESS INFORMATION IT CONTAINS.
IT WOULD SEEM THAT BOTH THE UNIFORM STRING OF ZERO'S AND
THE UNIFORM STRING OF ONE'S WOULD HAVE EQUIVALENTLY LEAST
AMOUNTS OF INFORMATION. HOWEVER THESE HIGHLY UNIFORM
STRINGS CAN BE COMPOSED OF SUB-DIVISIONS HIGHLY UNIFORM TOO. SO THESE STRINGS WITHIN STRINGS OF ZERO-ISH OR ONE-ISH
COMPOSED SUPER-STRINGS RESPECTIVELY OBEY ZORN'S LEMMA.
THAT MAKES THEM, IN OUR VIEW, WELL CONSTRUCTED IF NONE OF
THE DIVISIONAL STRINGS ARE FINITE IN LENGTH. THIS IS IOHO
PERFECTLY THE CASE WITH THE SUPERSTRING OF ONE'S. ARE
REASONING IS THAT A SUBSTRING AS ENDLESS STRING OF ONE'S
CANNOT BE SHOWN TO BE A FUNCTION OF THE SUPERSTRING.
THEREFORE OF COURSE NOR CAN A SUBSET OF AN UN-ENDLESS
STRING OF ONE'S. TO ACCOMPLISH UTILIZING BOTH FINITELY
INFINITE AND INFINITELY INFINITE ALGEBRAS OF STRINGS OF
ONE'S IN THE SAME DERIVATION, REQUIRES OUR HOBBYIST
ACTIVITY SHOWS, THE USE OF MINUS STRINGS OF ONE'S. THIS REASONING CANNOT APPLY TO THE ENDLESS SUBDIVISIONS
OF ZERO-ISH STRINGS? WHY WE MAY ASK, UNCONCERNED THAT OUR
SUB-FUGUE STATE OF CONSCIOUSNESS MIGHT GET THE BETTER OF
US AND CURTAIL AN ANSWER. (ONE MUST CONTEND WITH
EXTRANEOUS THOUGHTS LIKE AN ATHLETE IN ORDER TO UTILIZE
THEM EFFECTIVELY. RATHER NOT BE DISMISSIVE AS HIGH MATH
SCHOLAR'S COUSIN OF PSYCHOLOGISTS WOULD HAVE US DO TO
GUARD A CITADEL OF CAREFULLY OPTIMIZED DENIALS.) BECAUSE
ZERO AND MINUS ZERO ALL THINGS BEING EQUAL ARE PRESUMED
TO BE IDENTICALLY CONSTRUCTED. IN OTHER WORDS OUR ALGEBRAS
FOR ¥ & $ RESPECTIVELY ⁅0.11111..... ⁆⁅-0.11111.....⁆ W/
'RAVENOUSLY' ONE-ISH INFINITIES AND INFINITESIMALS? THOSE ALGEBRAS AS BIZARRELY FANTASTIC AS THEY ARE ARE
UNTENABLE AS FURTHER MODIFICATIONS TO THEM FOR HANDLING
THE DERIVATION OF F(0)=-0⁆. I MEAN YES IT'S POSSIBLE FOR
US TO BLAME UNRESTRICTED COMPREHENSION (OR POORLY
THOUGHT-OUT DRAFTING WITH SPECIAL TERMS AND SYMBOLS THAT
ARE DEAR TO THE HEART OF THE DRAFTERS THINKING ABOUT THESE
CONSTANTS, RAVENOUS YEN AND MINUS RAVENOUS DOLLAR) AND
HOIST MORE DUD SET THEOREMS. OUR DENY ACCESS TO PLATFORMS.
OR WE MIGHT ATTEMPT OUR OWN ANTI-PROOF FOR THE ASSERTION
THAT INFINITELY FINITE STRING OF ZERO'S ARE INCOMPATIBLE
WITH FINITELY FINITE STRINGS OF ZERO'S. WILL ANY ONE OTHER
SCHOLAR ON THIS PLANET COMMIT THEIR EFFORT AND MENTAL SPACE?! THERE WE WOULD CONCLUDE IT IS HYPOTHESIZED BY US AN
OUTSIDER MATHEMATICIAN THAT TO MAKE THE DERIVATIONS 'DO
THEIR TH(A)NG', MINUS ZERO IS THE POSITIVE RAVENOUS YEN.
SO MUST WE DERIVE AGAIN TO THAT THEOREM. WE HAVE DONE MANY
TIMES HERE, THERE, EVERYWHERE A MOO MOO. BLIND EYE'S
SEEMINGLY OBSERVING OUR PLAY, FEATURED IN IMGFLIP'S VENUE
OR REJECTED EITHER WAY, LESSENING THE VIEWS OF MORE BLIND
EYES GRATEFULLY. IF WE PUT SET THEORY OUT TO SEA ON A
PYRE OR AS A FEAST, WHATEVER, IT'S ANCHOR MAY SNAG
PHYSICS. AND THAT MINISTER GRAB HOLD, VIA NEW AGE QUANTUM
PSYCHOLOGIES, THE VERY NATURE OF MANKIND AND WE ALL DROWN
AT OUR DESKS WHERE THE SLOSHY TIDAL WAVE REVERTS TO. †THE FAULT IN OUR STARS
Caption this Meme
