Well, first, the number was replaced with "Meo" in the article and the article title was [ACCESS DENIED] even though said anomaly was not harmful nor heavily classified. Painful lack of hyphens, capitalization, or grammar (eg. Scp 8573 instead of SCP-8537). The anomaly itself was just the writer's OC, and it was referred to with "him" while anomalies are almost always referred to with "it," the exception being I Am A Toaster which is referred to in the first person and that one article saying you yourself are an anomaly where it uses "you." The clinical tone present in all mainlist articles is stunningly absent. And that's just what I remember.