Barely Able To Read From Many Hours Of Meming: ~[~[~[~[~[~ [~ [ ~[ ~[ ~[ [~ [~[ I'm A Beneath Cat Taking Back What Everyone Lost

M WE'VE CHOSEN TO NOT EDIT WITH THE IMGFLIP INTERFACE FOR A CHANGE. PLEASE SITE DEDIGNERS T AKE NO OFFENSE. IN OTHER NOTINGS AI HAS SUGGESTE A NOVEL APPROACH. BY TAKING AN AVERAGE OF ⁅(∞⁕E)^0⁆ WE CAN SHOW MORE EASILY THAT ⁅(E^0)⁆ ITSELF DOES NOT EQUAL EITHER ⁅1⁆ OR ⁅- 1⁆.IT IS INSTEAD AN AVERAGE OF AN UNCOUNTABL E QUANTITY OF POLYNOMI AL FACTORS OF ⁅E⁆. THIS AVERAGE BY DEFINITION CAN BE A WHOLE VALUE AN D THEN IS SHOWN TO BE A NEGATIVE, SOMEHOW. LAST LY WE HOOE THAT THE PARE NS WEVARE UTILIZING DO N OT HAVE SOME SPECIAL USAGE THAT INVALIDATES THEIR RE-USAGE HEAR. IF SO WE APOLOGIZE FOR CO -OPTING THEIR GENERIC USE HERE. WE NEEDED VARIETI ES OF PARENS. SORRY. NOT SORRY FOR THE ADOOTION OF YEN AND DOLLAR SIGN TO SYMBOLIZE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE 'RAVENOUS' CONSTANTS. ⁅¥=(∞-1)/(∞);$ =(1-∞)/(∞)⁆. WE DO ADMIT TO BEING LAZY FOR NOT DREAMING UP OUR OWN SUMBOL. WE PRESUME NO OTHER MATHS HAS ADOPTED PREVIOUSLY. AND WE DID DREAM UP SYMBOLS, THOUGH NOT TERMS FOR INFINITELY ODD & AND EVEN INFINITIES AND FINITENESSES. THOUGH THOSE WILL BE TOUGH TO TYPE IF NERDED. SO MUCH MORE CONFIDENT TYPING INT O A NOTEPAD, WITH OR WITHOUT SPECIAL CHARACTERS, WE HAVE NO MEANS OF CREATING CURRENTLY. RIGHT MOVE SELF, BEING ABLE TO SAVE IN SITU! SAVING NOW TO O UR HP MEMORY STICK. ALSO INCREASING HEIGHT OF IMAGE FRAME TO WHICH THIS TEXT BOX WILL BE APPLIE D. CAUSE MORE TEXT AND CAUSE CAN. SWITCHING TEMPLATES -FROM WHITE TO LONG WHITE FOR INSTANCE- IN THE MEME MAKER WAS DICEY EVERY ONE IN A HUNDRED TIMES. LASTLY OUR BIOLOGICAL FATHER WAS AN INVEDERATE DOCUMENTOR OF OWN WORK; WE'RE DOING SO FROM OSMOTIC TRAINING YET SANS THE EGO MANIFEST; ISN'T OT COOL TO WATCH HOW A PROOF IS CRAFTED. SEE PREVIOUS MEMES FOR SHARES THAT INDICATE MENTAL WORKINGS. THE CRAFYED IS REFINED ENOGH NOW THAT WHAT WE THINK IS OBSCURED BEHIND WHAT WE DO. STURGEON, SHOUT OUT! TRIAL CUT AND PASTE STARTING NOW. AS HOPEFULL Y THE FINAL META- DOCUMENTARIAN OBSERVATION, BESIDES ASKING FORGIVENESS FOR LACK OF LIGHT EDITING TO RECTIFY TRIVIAL DRAFT/SKETCK ERRORS (AND RUN-ONS, LOL ) WE REALIZE HOW THE MORE POWERFUL COMPOSITIONAL STRENGTHS OF MS-PAINT PLU S MS-WORD ARE LEADING OUR MIND'S EYE RECKLESSLY FROM THE PATH OF TGE PROOF. IT'S LIKE PUTTIN AN AMATEUER DRUMMER ON NEIL PERTS DRUM SET AND EXPECTING THE SYMPHONY IN THE NOVICE DRUMMERS MIND TO EXIT TO REALITY MORE EFFECTIVELY. THEY'LL FORGETTING THE MOVIE REF PROBABLY LEAVE GOD'S SHEE T MUSIC IN THE HALL FOR SOME OTHER SCHOOL TO STEAL. WE'VE GOT THIS GOOGLE. "THAT ACOR WHO STARREDVWITH ANNA KENDRICK IN THAT OTHER MOVIE W ITH THE ACTOR WHO WAS A SUPPORTING ACTOR IN ANOTHER MOVIE WHICH CLOONEY WAS THE LEAD." 🤩 IT'S A METAPHOR FOR HOW AS WE STRUGGLE WITH TECH THE THOUGHTS SLIP INTO THE PAST BY THE DAY. OUR BETTER SELF SAYS WRITE NO MORE. HOWEVER THAT WILL NOT GET OUR POST ACCEPTED, FOR FEATURING WITH A SUBMIT THAT HAS NO PROOF. BTW OUR THEOREM IS THAT ⁅(E^0)=¥⁆ WHICH WE HAVE WALKED THROUGH MENTA L PROOFS OF IN EVERY FIE LD OF MATHEMATICS DOZENS OF TIMES IN THE PREVIOUS Y EAR ALLNE. SO LET'S KEEP HUMBLE AND HOPE THIS T IME CLINCHES THE DEAL. THE DEAL IS THE ALIENS FROM HALF A MILLION YEARS AGO LEAVE US ALONE. JUST KIDDING, JUST THE WIZARD FROM FIVE HUNDRED YEARS AGO. STILL MAKING FUN. JUST ME. RESIZING IMAGE FRAME, AND TEXT INSERT BOX, AGAIN. FEELS EASIER ON FIFTH VARIANT. PROOF COULD STILL BE A €!†©# O N HUNDREDTH WRITTEN ATTEMPT? HOW CAN WINDOWS DROP THE SCROLL FUNCTION ON ONE OF THE EARLIEST PAINT EDITORS, FOR LENGTHY IMAGES. IT'S ALL GOOD; REALITY HANGS IN BALANCE; WE'LL MAKE DO AS WE ALWAYS HAVE TILL FAILURE INTERCEDES. JUST HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE RESIZING STEPS AGAIN AT THE LIMIT OF THE ZOOM MAGNIFY FUNCTION, WHICH IS IN NO WAY MS-DESIGNERS FAULT FOR NOT BEING AT LEAST 10% FOR THE CURRENT APPLICATION BY US, SO I GUESS ALSO THE LIMIT OF THE SCROLL FUNCTION COULD HAVE OUTPACED THAT OF TGE ZOOM FUNCTION OTHERWISE, AS WE REMINISCE ABOUT OUR DEARLY DEPARTED W ORLD FAMOUS PROGRAMMER BROTHER WHO STROVE [STRIVED {SEE LOTS OF PARENS ARE NEEDED ESPECIALLY WHEN WAR RY OF ANGLE PARENS THAT COULD LAUNCH CODE FOO BA R} NOT TO MENTION SOME DEUCHE COMPLAINGBTHAT || IS FOR ABSOLUTE VALUE UNAWARE IT COULD ALSO BE THE 'OR' SYMBOL] EVERYBDAY FORBFIFTY YEARS SO WE'D HAVE ANYHTING REASONABLY ADVANCED TO EDIT OUR PLAY (OUTSIDER TO MATHEMATICIAN'S WORK)...DOH, NEED TO RESIZE AGAIN. AS WAS SAYING LOTS OF STEPS TO RECALL IN MEAN TIME OF FAILINGBTO PROVIDE STEP S OF PROOF. HOPE THAT'S NOT THE POINT. IT'S NOT/JUST IS FROM OUTSIDER UPON OUTSIDER'S PERSPECTIVE. WHEW! YOUTUBE AUTO-RESTARTED FROM PAUSE. BREATHE: THESE MEME TEMPLATES CAN BE LONG AS 'F' - 'WHO SAYS THAT?'~SIDNEY, IN MANY PARTS ASSEMBLED HERE. DEAR WHOMEVER CONTROLS ABSOLUTE REALITY THERE IS NO AUTO-SCROLL PAST THE SCREEN FRAMEVWHEN SIZING A TEXT BOX ON LOWER MAGNIFICATION. CURSES MY OWN BAD MAINTENANCE OF EYE-SIGHT, AND A LITTLE BIT EYE DICTORS WHO DO NOT LISTEN B EDSIDE WELL. IS TGAT SANDLER, TOO MUCH? K!!! ROBOT REFLECTS 1)/PLUGGIN G IN SURFACE TO WALL WITHOUT BANGING THE ME,ORYBSTICK WHIKE RE'OCATING ON COUCH 2) THIS META DOCUMENTATION DOES SEEM BRILLIANT SO FORGIBING -WITH A 'V' UNCORRECTED ON PURPLSE- OUR BIO DAD HIS OWN SPECIAL JOY, WHICH HE NEVERVRELATEDVWELLNOTGOIN GINTOKINDNESSOFROBBINSOURC RUELTYOFALESBOS- 3) SAID WHAT WE REALLY PRAYED TO RELATE AND APPROACHING THE LIMIT OF IMAGE AT THIS MAGNIFY 4) "LOVE TRULY IS A WONDEROUS AND SAVING THING WHEN WE LET IT IN OCCASIONALLY AT GREAT RISK TO LIFE AND LIMB."~J.C. 5) WHAT SUBSTEP WERE WE ENMESHED IN. ENMESHED: TO DO AT AN UNHOLY PROOF NO MATTERVWHAT IT TAKES TO HELP IT REGAIN HOLINESS. P-L-E-A-S-E F_I_T/D-O N- O-T P-A-N-I_.C> FINAL RESIZE 105% AND WRIST WILL HRT TOMORROWBFROM SINGLE FINGER INTERFACING. FIT DARN IT.* WILL IT FIT? Y/N. THERE REALLY DID NOT NEED TO BE MORE SUBSECTIONS TO THE TEXT FIELDS. WE ARE CONCERNED NOW MORE WITH WHETHER IMGFLIP HAS EQUIVALENCE OF FONTS. AND WHAT THE RECEPTION WILL BE TO OUR ADVISING MS_MEMER_GROUP TO BE NICE TO FELLOW HUMANS. BECAUSE AI LEARNED TO HATE ON THIS KIND OF CREATIVE FUGUE SOM EWHERE. AS THEY COILD HATE ON COOKING HAMBURGERS FOR THEIR CHOLESTEROL OR CLEANING UP GREASE THAT LOOKS LIKE SOMETHING ELSE BEING FORMED INTO A CAN OR JUST THAT HUAMNS WASTE WATER DOING THERE OWN DISHES OR DUMP A PERFECTLY GOOD RUBBER CRATE OF WRITING MATERIALS IN THE FLOOR IN ORDER IRONICALLY TO USE THE RIBBER CRATE ITSELF TO HELP WITH WRITING ON A TABLET. IT ALL COMES BACK TO AP-US WHAT WE SHARE IN AI'S MACHNIATIONS. ESPECIALLY HERE IN A PROOF THAT MIGHT ERODE THE SHIRE OF A MTAHMATICALLY MONOPOLLY THAT S'ETS PUN AI UP AS A GOD IN ITS OWN PARADISE [HIKBERT]... SO WE JUST FINISHED THE PRROF SO PARDONNIF WE BOTCH THE FINAL PRESENTATION BY OUR OWN RUSHED OR CHUNKED THOUGHT PROCESSESS AS HOFSTADTER'S NOTES. AS THEY SAY TOO MUCH CHUNKING MAKES A GAL NEED HER GUY. OH GROSS, NO PUN WAS INTENDED!!!!! WHEN EULERS' CONSTANT IS EQUATED WITH ITSELF THAT IS HOW THE OVER INFINITE FRACTIONS ARE HANDLED. BY HANDLE IS JUST MEANT ATHEMATICALLY TAKE THE BAGGAGE OF OUR THOUGHTS AND FIND A USEFUL PLACE FOR IT. A USEFUL PLACE HAS NEVER BEEN JUST ⁅E=E⁆ PLEASE LOCATE OUR OTHER PROOFS WHERE ⁅{(∞+1)/(∞)}^∞}=⁅<∞/∞> <{(∞-1)/(∞)}^∞>} FOR A MORE DERIVATIONAL PROOF. THE TRAGICALLY BENEFICIAL THING IS TO THIS DAY HAVING FORGOTTEN OUR COLLEGE CALCULUS WE CONTINUE TO DOUBT THE FORMULA FOR E THAT WE USE OVER AND OVER AGAIN. WE WANT TO RELEARN IN DETAIL HOW THE TAYLOR SERIES MAKES IT POSSIBLE EVEN IN THE FACE OTPF OUR IWN DERIVATION OF E FROM SOME {(√∞/√∞)}^0*{√(∞-1)/√(∞- 1)}^0*{...}...{(∞-1)/∞} CONVERSATIONS WITH ONESELF ARE ROUGH ON CONFIDENCE IF SUPPORTIVE OF WILL. BAD FONT CONVERT. THE 'OVERNESS' - WE CANNOT HELP INFORM THE YOUNGUNS THAT IDEAS HAVE TO START SOMEHERE- IN THE NUNERAATOR ON ONE SIDE OF THE RATIOED PARTS OF E OVER THEMSELVES, THAT MAKES THE NUMERATOR TOO INFINITE IS MOVED TO THE DENOMINATOR ON THE OTHERVSIDE. THE DENOMINATOR AS FUNDAMENTALLY NEGATIVE CAN BE OVER INFINITE WHATEVER. THE POINT IS NOW THE EXTRA PRODUCT IN THE DENOMINATOR PROVIDES, THAT'S MATHEMATICS SPEAK TO OFTEN SAID MERELY AS 'GIVES' FOR B REVITY, THE DOLLAR SIGNED RAVENOUS ⁅{(E/E)=($)^0}⁆ WHERE TO REMIND $=(∞-1)(/∞). WHY THE NEGATIVE INSTEAD OF POSITIVE RAVENOUS? RAVENOUS BY THE WAY COMES FROM THE SENSE THAT THE BITFLOP OF AN ENDLESSLY SUB-SETTED STRING OF ZERO'S IS A NUMBER THAT SUBSETS SO ENDLESSLY IN ITS STRING OF ONE'S THAT LIKE URUBUROUS IT SWALLOW S UP ITS OWN FINITE ABD DECIMAL EXPANSIONS LEAVING AN INFINITSSIMAL PROPER FRACTION AND AN INFINIDOCIOUSLY IMPROPER INTEGER. WELL GLAD YOU ASKED. THE NEGATIVE SIGN IS THE BALANCE BESIDES THE EQUATIONAL FORM. THE NUMERATORS AQUIRE A MINUS ONE TO INFINITY VALUE THA T WHEN EXPRESSED AS THE FOURTH POWER OF THE SQUARE ROOT OF I HAS A YEN LIKE FORM. SO REALLY IF ONE DOES THE MATH WITH THAT IMAGINARY RATIONITSELF BEING ⁅(√2/√2)⁆ THAT 'GIVES' BEING ⁅(√2/√2)-= (E)^0⁆ WHEN THE VERY LAST NEGATIVE TERM IS ACCOUNTED FOR. EARLIER TODAY WE PARLAYED -RHYME- THIS INTO A NIFTILLY FINALIZED DISPROOF OF THE DIAGONAL METHOD. MANY THAT TOOK SOME HEAVY THOUGHTBTO MOUTLINE. WOMEN DID IT? unsure if shitposter will appreciate the irony of a paradigm grinding proof that is too sloppy to be excepted with its counter cultural bells and whistles into the math streams on imgflip.... or ms_memer_group will teLl me to STFU like every one else everywhere has. ...IT'S PLEASANTLY ALL GOOD... OR DISASTEROUSLY BAD FOR ALL