Inserted image is a rejected meme (from other stream) in a shared context. Commonly failing to get why a meme about 'Proof' is math humour, is not personal. The extensionality to frequently getting why a meme about 'Good Will Hunting' is math humour makes sense. Anyone could miss the former reference and find the later.
So unlike the moderators occasionally failing to understand math humour about the depths of math analysis -we were never screeding on that inadequacy- I am less stuck. My intentional bent that nothing is ambiguous about some undistributed TOE? Well that should have no resonance that anyone has to any reality. It's just the way that it is. FOR NOW?!*
To meta analogize it's like children not getting their parents Dad jokes. Children by definition do not have children, so why would they. And persisting in understanding childish humour at the extrema prevents adults from multiplying themselves. So if we did have the same sense of mathematical humour as everyone else our paradigm would not exist in our own minds as potentially transmissible.
...sorry. I honestly meant to comment with the mathematics stream. Now I seem like I am making multiple screeds everywhere. So it goes when new knowledge causes chaos from it's own unacceptably untested ethical bias. anyway i'm here now. i'll try to keep away from actual ideas.