Imgflip Logo Icon

No bias, be real

No bias, be real | Genuine question; Who would win a 1v1, no guns, no swords, no army. Just fists? | image tagged in msmg,george washington,king george iii | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
82 views 3 upvotes Made by Sgt.Soap 2 months ago in MS_memer_group
10 Comments
0 ups, 2mo
George Washington
0 ups, 2mo,
1 reply
george, he aint old as f**k
0 ups, 2mo,
1 reply
which george lol, cause King George the III was younger and died after washington
0 ups, 2mo
oh wait george washingmachine, i forgor, but also he wasnt royalty and had prolly gotten in fights before
0 ups, 2mo,
1 reply
George easy. George fought in the thick of the Revolutionary war while George sat on his ass in England
0 ups, 2mo,
1 reply
Counter argument
George laid mainly on strategy, not individual fighting. And King George is the same thing
0 ups, 2mo
That is true, but George was still physically present in the harsh weather and battlefields, enduring it with his men. George wasn't.
0 ups, 2mo
Washington
0 ups, 2mo
Washington absolutely
Has king George even been in battle
0 ups, 2mo
lets see, both were excellent strategists, although that doesn't translate much into one on one fighting, per se.
But still, at the time of the war, it was a 38-year old king and a 44-year old soldier, I'd say maybe Washington has the upper hand, being a soldier, but there is no records on King George III's strength he could have been hella jacked for all we know. Going off what we know which isn't much, I'd say George high dif
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 2
  • King George III
  • George Washington
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    Genuine question; Who would win a 1v1, no guns, no swords, no army. Just fists?