Please explain I simply don't understand

First of all, we don't "rail" animals. The common consensus is to exclude people who do that. Second, we like to dress up sometimes because it's fun. Doesn't even have to be a full suit; simple cat ears can do it too while even being found outside the fandom. It's not necessarily normal, but in the end, we are just people. Being a furry doesn't fundamentally define who we are. For most, it's just a neat thing that they find enjoyment in. Out of fun, nothing more.

Ok I see more of your point, But if I like shooting people in airsoft which gives pain, And it's not looked as weird where as in this case being a "furry" isn't let me explain that...Humans where made as humans not dogs or cats, correct?

Yeah. Humans were not made as dogs and cats. Rather, they have their own evolutionary branch in mammals.

They were also created naked.

Point 1 thank you for admitting that because most people don't...2 And so like if we have our own branch why don't we have tails or fur which is the example in this case...3 So why don't we jsut walk around naked?

1. Science :3
2. At some point we had fur and tails. That point was when we were still comparable to apes. The traits just got lost over time, but the genes are still there. I mean, the human genome still has all necessary genes to produce feathers, it's just not triggered.
3. Because we have developed standards in a society, which has been accomplished through complex neurological structures, also known as "brain". This brain has, broadly viewed, a lot of variance from person to person, which makes things like homosexuality possible. The brain is just as functional, but the sexuality aspect is changed. This ability to attain variance has an evolutionary advantage, as diversity can not only open up innovation, but peer to peer relationships are always useful for strengthening the bond of a group, be it hetero- or homosexual. The reason I bring this up is that neurological variance leads to things like different taste or preference just as much as early developmental influence like parenting does. Which means that furries are just a product of their environment and the randomness of biology.

And so if we were MENT to have fur and tails we would have them...but we don't...right...and out of all the billions of people don't you think that gene would be triggered?

It would take a lot of failed termination base triplets to activate those.

See, but outof like the 10 billion plus people who have/were alive not one has had feathers

Like I said, the chance of that happening is lower than every single person in the state of Rhode Island winning the lottery at the same time.

Ok so there has been roughly like 10-13 billion people born so like it has had to have happened with at least 1 out of that 10ish billion.
Thats what I'm getting at 1 person out of 10ish billion had to have but hasn't

What do you define as "meant to have"? We were never "meant" to have clothes or ear rings or technology, and yet here we are. Just let us have fun.

Meant meaning not supposed to normally have, Humans were not supposed to have -tails and/or fur-

Okay, and how does that support what point?

Humans arn't supposed to have either the things you listed nor mine.
That's why I'm confused about this whole thing

Just because we don't have something we find to be cute doesn't mean we can't at least approximate it. I like wearing my cat ears with the same compassion as a southern hillbilly gives his shotgun.

But like it's weird look around when you're outside how many people are doing it from what you see