Any thoughts on this? I'm stumped.

Because they're all Russian assets? Or have Mob ties?

It seems like it'd be a good test to find TDS in the FBI.

because if they turn up something dreadful, it must be fabricated?

Not necessary, but if they come up with something fabricated, again, you'll know who to boot.

doesn't it bother you that Republicans elected someone who wanted to fabricate victory in 2020? why didn't they boot him in 2024?

The president for what Trump did was set was set by democrats during Nixon, but thanks for the subject change. It is unconstitutional for governors and courts to change the voting process and https://finance.yahoo.com/news/heartland-rasmussen-poll-one-five-161100197.html

it wasn't a subject change because we were talking about fabricated victory and consequences or lack thereof. what did democrats do during Nixon's time? if it was something illegal, i don't see how that makes it ok for Trump to do it. to me that would make him just as bad.

Nope, it is a whataboutism and a subject change from FBI corruption. But thanks for lying to me.

i have to say, i'm not at all used to everyone disagreeing with me like this. and when you think someone's lying to you, but they're not, it means you're not looking at thinks the right way. don't bother apologizing. i've already forgiven you ( :

Nope, you changed the subject from FBI corruption to Trump and said you didn't change the subject. That is lying and a whataboutism.

what·a·bout·ism
/ˌ(h)wədəˈboudizəm/
nounBritish
the technique or practice of responding to an accusation or difficult question by making a counteraccusation or raising a different issue.
"the parliamentary hearing appeared to be an exercise in whataboutism"

alright, alright. i admit it: i was wrong about you having potential. go and be yourself. it'll have to be ok.

look, we're not going to make any progress at all if you try to educate someone on things you can't judge very well. giving the example of Trump was me pointing out your hypocrisy about booting people who fabricate evidence when your hero tried to do exactly that. so i'm willing to take you on as an acolyte because you're motivated and i think you have some potential, but if you don't start worshipping the ground i preach from pretty soon, it's not going to work out.

So you admitting to the whataboutism and subject changing without realizing it. But thanks for pretending to know what I believe and attacking me for what you made up for me to believe.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/whataboutism