i hear that English can be a tricky second language. we don't say Comrade. try Buddy or Pal or Charlie. and you might want to read that graph again to get its full meaning.
liz's job is to defend conservative poitical figures, so we shouldn't expect her to take any other positin on Gaetz. history will show the truth, one way or the other.
No, bulverism assumes the position invalid and changes the topic as to an aspect of the one that made the statement, rather that the validity of the statement. It'll apply whether the statement is valid or not because the reasoning itself is flawed.
but i didn't claim her position to be wrong because it was her position. all i said was that it's her job to defend that position, which it is. i do believe her position to be wrong, though, because the evidence is pointing in that direction.
you used liz as a source to discredit my lack of faith in Mattie. i only pointed out that liz is not an objective authority. that doesn't mean she's wrong. she is probably wrong, in my judgment. i'm sorry, but there's nothing fallacious in that analysis.
