i have no idea what point this proves but umm debate in the comments

Mine contained nudity and served no humorous purpose so I disapproved it

exactly

are you defending the 'haha i posted hentai but theres no nudity so its legal' kids now

not at all

mk

Dawg the post served no humorous purpose, that means it's against the tos

thats not against the TOS

its 'nudity + no purpose'

but still i dont care i dont wanna see that shit