dawg its the same thing as "ShE's A 100 yEaR oLd VaMpIrE"

Arent you the one who defended diddling talking animals and inhuman aliens???

A. I am politically neutral. Though if there is one thing I agree with the right is that wokeness is ruining society.
B. I support Democracy and Human rights.
C. PETA is an evil "animal rights" organization that kills people's pets and brainwashes people into believing that eating meat is "evil".
D. No
E. I would never commit warcrimes.
F. I simply say no thank you.
G. I don't know anything about human supremacism. But humans ARE superior to aliens.
H. So long as he isnt causing trouble I suppose not.
I. Tell them to get out of our planet. Earth belongs to humanity.
J. Grateful, but I that doesnt mean I will start anthropomorphising aliens.
K. I don't know.
L. Making sure to establish law, order and justice amongst humanity.
M. No, again I am politically neutral. Also far-left extremism is bad.
N. I am against the Chaos Gods. And for the record no, I don't support killing furries unironically.
O. I just thank him and then we part ways.

Now answer my question. And btw why are you asking me all of this???

(Sorry for responding late, I was busy.)

C. Not sure if they provide HAMAS with weapons. I mean PETA is evil but there is no concrete evidence of them supporting HAMAS or providing weapons to anyone. And it seems very unlikely given they spend more time trying to brainwash people into worshiping animals and forcing veganism down people's throats.

G. This is not about "being advanced", its about the fact that humanity comes first. An alien race, no matter how advanced it is, will never be our equals. Humans simply are better than everything else. Here is a video that explains everything with more detail: https://youtu.be/9sIJsxJN2_M?si=_r6ZiIzBEAOgTFGV

(Sorry for responding late, I was busy with other things.)

-"know.....There are BIG differences between diddling an anthropomorphic being that can wear clothes, speak English, stand upright, get a job, fight in wars, and understand something as complicated as consent, and diddling a plain old animal that can't consent."

That doesn't change the fact that its still bestiality and wrong though. You can argue that its not as bad as the latter but its still wrong. Simply put they anatomically are more animal than human (some even very animal-like in anatomy and some even having realistic animal heads and anatomy), and its simply unnatural. Plus the human brain is not hardwired to be attracted to creatures like that.

-"And if the Alien knows you and is interested in relations with you, then make sure your compatible with it and don't tell anyone about it. If the alien is humanoid (which it may not be) and sentient, and can consent, then go for it. if not, then don't. thats a red flag of zoophilia."

Ok your not making sense here. "Dont tell anyone about it" wdym?? And for the record it takes more than being humanoid to not be considered creepy. It has to look both anatomically and facially human enough to not be considered creepy or gross. You are simplifying bestiality and its issues while also anthropomorphising xenos. This is not just about consent. Its about biology, sanity, societal norms and LEGAL CONCERNS. And this entire consent hyperfixiation is what leads to defending diddling feral animal characters. Because remember, any fictional animal or creature can be given intelligence by the person who created it.

If they where more human than animal, they woudnt have animal faces, heads or snouts. But they do. And I get where the attraction comes from, but it still doesnt make it right. Just keep your fetish to yourself and dont condone cartoon bestiality. Please.

fax