finally something good that came out of this stupid ai image maker

Yes 👍☺️☺️☺️

yes

Awwwwwww

Are ya blind cuz ai is always genuine rubbish

i hate people who hate AI for no reason

Theres no point in arguing with a fool. Cause then it only makes 2

There is no way you think I'm the fool while you're out here defending ai slop

You’re confusing I don’t like this with this is worthless. The term AI slop is overused and unoriginal. AI is a helpful tool that everyone has used. If you think anything and everything produced by AI is "slop" then you can think of it that way. Calling it "slop" doesn’t make you clever it just makes you predictable.

'Unoriginal'bold words coming from someone defending something that uses other images to 'make' stuff like this.

That argument only works if you think originality means creating from nothing, which isn’t how art, writing, or ideas have ever worked

WELL BEING INSPIRED ISNT THE SAME AS RIPPING SOMETHING OFF

That’s a different argument. You started with ‘AI can’t be creative,’ now it’s suddenly about water usage and subjectively calling the image rubbish. Pick a lane

I already proved how it ain't creative.that ship has sailed.now imma talk about the environmental impacts until you gain iq and realise human made art is better in every way

Then address the claim in that post instead of gesturing at it. Saying ‘case in point’ isn’t an argument unless you actually explain the point

Wasting water to make an image of a rubbish jurassic park trex isn't exactly the best idea

Because tools aren’t the problem. Misusing them or refusing to understand them is. Defending a tool isn’t the same as claiming everything it produces is great

Case in point:the original post that started this madness

You just demonstrated that tools don’t determine creativity, people do. Thanks for making my argument for me

Then why did you defend ai,which is a tool.

If originality meant ‘no prior influence,’ then no human has ever had an original thought

When did I say no prior influence you genuine idiot

Insults aren’t analysis, and posting a random image isn’t a definition of creativity. If that’s all you’ve got left, we’re done here.

'Posting a random image isn't the definition of creativity' notice how it is ai generated.

You’re arguing what art should feel like, not how creativity actually works. That’s fine—but it’s a value judgment, not proof

I would continue this argument dissecting you like a toad in biology but I cannot guide the willingly blind.

Also do you think this is creative?

You didn’t say it but your definition relies on it. If recombining ideas isn’t creativity, then neither humans nor AI qualify. Pick one.

Then why are you defending ai in the first place?ai had no soul and cannot think for itself without theft.human made art is different,it has soul,intent,its not math masquerading as a drawing.

Cool meme. Shame it’s still not a counterargument.

Also,creativity isn't putting a few ideas into a blender and calling it a day,creativity is actually thinking original thoughts,creating original things,etc.

Nothing is being ‘ripped.’ That’s just a dramatic way of saying ‘I don’t understand how it works.