i say that this is better than this

Tyranny? Uhhhhhh excuse me. Everyone should have a say in anything

With a strong central authority, there is true leadership and progress. When every person has a say, idiots voice their opinions and make the world more moronic

When you don't own yourself, you own nothing. And if idiots voice themselves, smart people can stop them.

And of the central authority is corrupt, who stops them?

In a monarchy, there is one person in charge. All corruption can be traced to one individual and be stopped

One person in charge means not everyone gets a voice and things can go wrong if one person doesn't like something. Anarchy is when everyone has a voice. And if one has a stupid voice then the smart people can stop them.

So basically, in an anarchy everyone kills each other if they are idiots

Not that kind of taking down

Then what? No police means no prison, and "peaceful" options are ineffective

Who told you peaceful was ineffective?

Well, what peaceful things could you do then?

There is a way to convince one to agree with you. And of course if the idea works then they'll be convinced. And what if a central power is stupid? Then what do we do

You could get the King to abdicate, it has worked almost every time