Andrew breaks all of those.

FR.

and people still don't understand this cuh

Just a couple people apparently

he said, as he threw a controller at his stepfather

._.

he said, as he typed some emojicon, oh bother.

YEP

she said, as she was watching miniforce

HOW DOES BEO KNEO

she said, but does she realize that her throat was coarse?

nuh uh

she said, but glazing nat's balls won't help you through the course

QJAT

she said, because aroace people refuse to have intercourse

Fr

you can't be saying shit bro
I'm sorry but you broke this exact rule today 😭🏳️‍⚧️

wrong emoj8

Bro what's with the flag 💀

wrong emoj

Lmao

Yes

@Andrew

Bro can't tell the difference between p*rn and raunchy memes lmao

Newsflash, they're different.

read the last line again 🗿

actually, this applies to both.

No, it doesn't.
Site mods clarified this hundreds of times already.
I'm never going to stop. EVER.
If Andrew or the other mods say it doesn't break TOS, then I post it.

Cry more.

bruh you actually listen to Andrew?? 🗿

the only one crying is you lil bro 🗣🔥

Remind me who's bitching about non-TOS violating images again?

Hint hint, nudge nudge.
It's not me.

https://youtu.be/VMVm8xnBwog

Wtf

You're not supposed to click it, just want to mentally damage Darth memeus

You're literally posting pictures of completely naked women. That's porn.

Except, it isn't. Otherwise all those Ancient Greek statues would be taken down. It's art. Difference. Plus they abide by the terms of what constitutes nudity per Imgflip's terms and conditions.

Ancient Greek statues are art. You posting images of random women without clothes on a meme website is not art, and is not even remotely the same thing by today's standards.

todays standards for art is if it has more than 3 lines it belongs in a museum

I can't deny that, but no way you agree what he's posting is art.

Ummm yes it is. Or else the site mods would have removed it.

Your definitions don't matter. In philosophy or law.

No genitals are showing as per site TOS. The same posts site mods themselves post.

Good thing the images are not pornographic in nature then. So I'm good to post. If there's an issue a sitemod will tell me.

Good for me that they aren't then :)

An image of a naked woman very obviously getting penetrated is not pornographic? 🗿

Nope. It covers up the TOS-violating parts and changes the context to a crude but acceptable joke.

These templates are freely accessible of Imgflip's website and are posted by moderators themselves.

That is an incorrect statement. Your images are pornographic in nature, despite covering genitals.

Uh-uh, no they aren't, silly.

These kinds images have been up on Imgflip for 10 years. Even sitemod's post them.

You can't possibly think we're that stupid

No, I think you're even dumber.

Corrupt mods apparently. And they are pornographic, or are you incapable of reading the literal definition of the word I sent you?

You clearly aren't capable of reading the definition of the words you yourself have sent.

Your ability to ignore reality is astounding.

Idk what your source is, but the dictionary disagrees

The dictionary also defines, 'intent and purpose'.

In which case the intent is an image meant to illicit a humorous reaction.

The purpose is to play on a specific trope.

It is art, comedic art. And it's allowed per sitewide TOS.

Dude we've all seen where you post this shit. It's not humorous in any way and you not it. You follow every NSFW stream known to man. Literally too scared to even just admit it.

Those streams are for adults. Where we post adult content (grated it abides by the global TOS)

The stuff posted elsewhere is done in a usurious way hence why it is allowed.

You'll get there one day.

More proof you have no idea what you're talking about. I'm literally a f**king adult dude.

Apparently, if you think anybody would ever believe that.

You're still posting pornographic content on a site where the primary users a minors, where it is easily accessible to all of them.

You keep saying that minors shit as if that makes a difference.

HELLOOOOO dummy, they aren't pornographic in nature.

How else do you think the booty stream would be able to stay up and not get banned otherwise.

You are denying the literal definition of the word

Yes, you are indeed in denial.

Obscene pictures intended to cause arousal. That's what you're posting.

And the key difference being intent and purpose. Which defines the difference between P*rn and art.

You'll figure out the difference one day.

You keep saying I'll figure that out someday like I'm some dumbass little kid. If you can't see that what you're posting is in fact pornography, you're insane. The only other remotely logical option is that you're a complete liar.