Bringing back some debate here.

I'm pretty sure most or y'all think the conflict is silly. It is indeed, but the base of it are not. Both sides did horrible things I don't need to list there. But what is important to understand is that there we are talking about the group as a whole. Now take individuals, the chances they did those things are quite low actually. And there you got the whole problem of this conflict : hurting innocent third parties. That's why this conflict is silly. Not only it doee pretty much nothing in a good way, but there's so much collateral damage (bringing innocent people in a horrible drama, defamation, harassment) that in the end, it's even debatable if it's worth it.