The Soviet Union didn't even last 70 years

you forgot this

Thanks! Monarchies/Empires are the best in world history!

yes

For the glory of akkad

Yes, for the glory

let me add the crown

Thanks again! I also crown you emperor of any empire of your choice

Akkad

but they have no crown

they have a hair bun

see the statue of sargon of akkad, the founer of akkad

Then, you shall hereby be the emperor of Akkad!

well their title was king, and the word for that in akkadian is Lugal

and akkad in akkaian is 𒆳𒌵𒆠

and that says mat akkadi in sounds

I see, you sure know a lot about Akkad

Yes, and put the new comments on th comment string

I am tring to tranlate King of akkad into akkadian. That is very hard to do

Probably not easy with a dead language

In Russian, it's pretty simple. "Царь" which is "Tsar"

i know that, but akkadian has not been spoken since the rise of the neo babylonians

That's quite a while ago

yes, they stoped existing when cyrus ii regined

Ok then

too hard to find a akkaian translator

to be honest both were just the same type of ruling just with some fancy shmancy cover on top

Not really, they were quite different in several ways:
USSR was Communist, Russian Empire was Monarchist
USSR was atheist, Russian Empire was Christian
USSR was anti-America, Russian Empire had good relations with America
And there's a few more quite major differences

Listen here.
Both had one centralised ruler (monarchy and dictatorship).
USSR still was in terrible condition, like the Russian Empire.

Russian Empire was a lot better

still you get the idea: centralised command

Monarchy is much less corrupt than communism though

Communism: doctrine where everyone is equal
Monarchy: form of ruling where a single person runs the country

Communism isn't corrupt, it's just practically impossible to implement in a country.

I know, it will always collapse. It paves the way for a dictatorship, seen predominantly in the USSR and North Korea.

I know.
TBH communism is a good idea in theory, but just a nightmare in practice because everyone is a lone wolf without rules and guidelines. Life would be chaos.

I know, that's why so many Russians supported it until they realized it was too late.

uh huh

Not to mention, monarchs can be corrupt too.

They could, but for the most part they know how to rule, and do it well. All government types could face corruption, but Monarchy tends to have the least. In a Democracy, corruption is widespread and can't be easily stopped, while in a Monarchy you could trace it down to one or a few individuals.

ye

Communism is still the better

No it's not, Monarchy is superior. Russia was a Monarchy for 800 years, but only a Communist state for just under 70. Monarchy is much more stable and was the first form of government to exist.

The only way communism can work is with the community lifestyle

And that never happens, as everyone has their own objectives