I always admired their creative ways of solving their own problems.

And achieve equity.

Since everyone will be starving and homeless, you're technically correct.

Exactly

In the end it's about being correct.❤️

To be fair, both Capitalism and Communism are bedfellows, like strawberry and vanilla.

In their infantile states, both of them seem to promise freedom for all.

In its necessary conclusion, however, Capitalism will inevitably be dominated by the government—becoming State Capitalism—which is indistinguishable from Communism.

Two roads. One goal. Two wings. One bird.

Below*

And with the current min wage you couldn’t live below your wage even if you hunted rats for sustenance.

Minimum wage is IRRELEVANT. Dozens of differing 'taxes' are the problem; the more you make the more they take anyways, so making more for you means more for the gov to waste.

Income tax should be illegal, and so should giving money to anyone who is able to work.

If the left wants equality, then they should start by helping the economy out $Billions and support the cutting off of free funding for anyone who is capable of working and contributing to the maintenance of society.
You leftists hate racism? Well then, no one should be given another dime of taxdollars just because they come from a certain ethnicity or race—at least until the country is back on its feet.
Either way, young citizens should not be forced to pay extra taxes simply because they are of a certain race.

Furthermore, all religious groups should NOT be tax exempt. They are political parties, not charities—no matter how hard they try to pretend they are.

And politicians also should make a max of $100,000/yr. No bonuses, no raises.
Lets see how many stick around and help out.
This alone would save the economy and push out the freeloader politicians who are fleecing the country and draining our resources. Most of them (if not all) are there for the perks.
'Public servants', as if.
Same goes for school teachers and education board members.

Economy saved. I guarantee it.

You Leftists want to complain? Stop attacking the symptoms, and identify the cause.
Its the Overlords laughing at both Rights and Lefts who think its the other persons fault, when most of those you attack are IN THE SAME SINKING BOAT AS YOU!

Seriously, get it together, our country needs all the common sense it can get now.

Oh god not an anarcho libertarian…

Look we tried the whole “let’s make a federal government that can’t collect on taxes.” Deal with the articles of confederation and it was such a disaster that it nearly lead to the death of America before a year after the revolution…because it refused to pay its soldiers and couldn’t feed its soldiers in valley forge.

Forced Washington to steal food while only offering nearly worthless ious. While British forces and civilians are comfortably.

He himself called it “a many headed hydra absolutely incapable of pulling in any one direction.”

But social safety net programs don’t even compare to the billions spent on oil, sugar and corn subsidies much less our military which is spent on no bid contracts. That should be the starting point before you keep hitting the poor as cutting all social safety nets absolutely would lead to food riots.

Thanks for the label, I really didnt know what I was until you told me.
Anyways, I'm not hitting the poor, and I didnt say to cut all taxes. I certainly didnt declare anarchy.

Not sure how you got all that.

And to cut oil and the military is probably not much brighter of an idea than one you presumed I stated and then condemned.

“Those capable of working shouldn’t receive money.” Single moms and dads who need food stamps and child care to get buy would absolutely be devastated by a cut to social safety nets. That’s hitting the poor.

True there be upheaval over oil costs but with more public transportation that would help ease the pain especially if whatever president goes on national television and says “an industry with record profits doesn’t need government subsidies. They are just greedy.”

As for military spending. No it’d be quite easy to cut pricing without cutting soldier pay or equipment. Just put a hard cap on how much executives can receive from those contracts and ban no bid contracts. That competition alone would dramatically lower costs.

No, sorry. That's not hitting the poor, that's hitting the lazy:
2Th 3:10 Even while we were with you, we gave you this command: "Those unwilling to work should not get to eat."
Our economy is not in a current healthy condition to have barnacles on the ship.

However, its always been a Christian staple to give to the poor who cannot work:
2Co 9:9 NLT - 9 As the Scriptures say, "They share freely and give generously to the poor. Their good deeds will be remembered forever."

I hope you can now recognize the difference between the two. Everyone knows somebody who is fleecing the system when they are capable of working. I know several of them, even some who go to church to also fleece off of naive Christians. (Many of them are preachers.)

Either way, it should be the churches who give to the poor—not the government.
In fact, I found that the secular government has taken the responsibility of feeding the poor out of the church's hands into their own hands, with the intention of 'helping the poor back on their feet'.

This is a major problem because 1) the church has now become a business, not a charity, and 2) most government jobs are attractive to those who also love to milk the system. Thus, you have myriads of lazy people directing jobs intended to filter out lazy people.
*****

Public transportation works only in jam-packed-smart-cities where everyone works within walking distances. It's certainly not for everyone.

I agree with your military solution, but that cap should apply to every public and even private sector that are necessities. That money needs to feed the coffers so taxes are lowered.

Anyways, what I further said was that the working class is being fleeced and drained in all directions by needless taxes and subsidies, and yet the media (who is also funded by taxpayer dollars) is continually—and tactfully—fracturing the public and redirecting their frustrations against each other, as if Right vs. Left, men vs. women, children vs. parents, traditional vs progressive, black vs. white, straight vs. gay, Christian vs. Muslim etc, etc, is going to make a lick of difference in maintaining a comfortable standard of living for everyone's families. It wont.

BUT it gives the people an equal enemy they can see on a day-to-day basis on whom they can vent their anger upon..

The public schools, movies, TV, radio stations and advertisements are all coordinating this effort. We are all being duped. Im sure you can see this.

One problem with your thesis. Government aid for low income people has work mandates and means testing.

Well we don’t live in a theocracy and depending on the church helping the needy comes with strings like trying to pray the gay away. (Not all churches orc).

I agree corporate infrastructure has been abusing several media sources and lobbying to pit people against each other but dissolving all taxes would only screw us out of being to fund our institution just like the articles of confederation.

But over turning citizens united and banning money in politics would help put an end to that monopoly on our politicians.

The Gov aid for testing is flawed, because the people who carry out the tests are flawed.
As I said, everyone knows a freeloader who should be working but instead is 'milkin it'.

The churchs primary job is to help the poor. Only a miniscule amount of them do. The rest treat their church like a cash cow.

As for praying the gay away, if the those poor school kids werent sexually expoited for political and medical purposes by the school teachers and staff, there wouldnt be any gay epidemic.
However it is indoctrinared and encouraged in schools to fight against Nature itself, so children are bribed and groomed with gifts from pervert school staff to alter their sexuality (paid for by taxdollars of course).

Again, I never said abolish all taxes.
There are necessary ones, however, you simply arent acknowledging the myriad of different needless taxes that are extorted from the populace.

Imagine thinking gay people is an outbreak of a disease like an epidemic…

Couldn’t be me.

That's because you're not thinking about it from an outside perspective.
That's because school has taught you what to think instead of how to think.

Aside from the obvious epidemic of diseases that accompany the dirty habit, it is more than just a progressive ideal to reshape the minds of the children against their predecessors.

"Labeling Theory posits that self-identity and the behavior of individuals may be determined or influenced by the terms used to describe or classify them."
This means that people who 'willingly' identify with secular class labels and groups (like being 'gay') have been primarily influenced by secular education and medical 'experts' who use these groups as social experiments, rather than genuinely looking out for the individual's (or, victim's) best interest.

This further means that, if you permit anyone—either a teacher or school staff member—to label or encourage you into having any sexual inclination or bent (especially if you are a prepubescent child) you will unconsciously develop the symptoms of said mental condition.

This is generally a bad thing, (not only because the teacher is acting like a pervert talking about sexuality with a child) but, additionally, because there is a Conflict of Interest at work.
Either the school teacher is willing to sell-out their conscience for a fat paycheque to teach that tripe to children; or because the child is classified by their fledgling sexuality by doctors, psychiatrists, and counselors who then can make lots of money off of the years of therapy, medication, and surgeries they can then prescribe to the poor, unsuspecting child long into their adulthood.

Follow the money and intentional cultural shift, not the political indoctrination you are forced to swallow in school.

Per my last email, negotiate higher wages or locate a job that pays higher earnings.

Except conservatives are anti union and are against union negotiating tactics for higher wages.
As a single worker can’t negotiate nearly as effectively.
Alone you beg together we bargain.

Unless the union works in their own best interests and not the interests of the workers.
That happens all the time, too.

Whats worse is every worker has to pay for the union to exist and have a job—whether they like it or not? Sounds like an extortion racket to me.

Not sure what kind of bosses you had, but the 'corporations' that I know are small time hardworking businessmen who are extorted taxes for almost 50% of their wages and barely make ends meet after paying their employees, insurance, tools, licences etc..
The bosses I DID work for that had money ALREADY HAD money before going into business, or worked for 12hrs/day for 25+yrs.

The corporations who control politicians are never the middle class.
They are the upper elitist class that pay for the media moguls and socialist sell-out school teachers to convince ppl like you that all your problems are because of the hardworking middle class.

Ah yes I remember my chapters on Marxism when I was taking calc 3 in stem….

Oh wait that shit doesn’t happen.

That's because the education system has failed to teach you how to properly think for yourself. Don't worry, it's not your fault, and you're not alone.

Calc 3? What a colossal waste of time; as is 90% of what the schools teach kids.
School has become nothing but glorified daycare.

And ask friends and family members to review your resume. And, above all, read about money.

It is absolutely HILARIOUS that conservatives tell non conservatives to learn about money when the way pushed for Reaganomics which was laughed out of Congress in the 1800s when it was referred to as horse oat theory.

Especially when most of them are trust fund brats who leaned on family but don’t like being told that so they tell everyone they are self made.

You know what's even funnier? Far-leftists suggesting that centralized, government control of the economy is better than Reganomics when most of them still live with their wealthy, 1%er parents.

wait what most 1% trust fund kids are far right conservatives just look at Donald’s kids. They ain’t socialists…

Your evidence is pointing to one family in the entire nation? My evidence is the entirety of ivy league college graduates, attended only by the wealthiest families of the country, probably truat fundees, who identify themselves as far-left. Including the faculty.

That’s entirely an assumption based off nothing but vibes.

Mine mite be anecdotal but that’s more then you offer.

Oh also let’s not forget Tucker Carlson heir to the Swanson fortune.

Is he related to Soros? The Clinton's? The Obamas? Epstein? The Koch Brothers? Bloomberg? Bezos? No those are leftists. When it comes to elitism and disconnect from the average person, the Left and their coastal elite beat everyone by far. Anyways, we are getting off track. Socialism sucks and central economies destroy country's and starve people to death. Full stop.

LMFAO the koch network? Leftist???
The pac that helps fund the FEDERALIST SOCIETY.

Okay bro let’s calm down and maybe regather your thoughts because that was completely unhinged.

Lol I knew you'd have to Google that one.

8h98k1.jpg [image not found]
I would never steal L's from your stockpile provided by your terrible politics. Especially when Ls are distributed by central planning.

Bro.
Any leftist worth their salt knows that by memory.

I didn’t need to google that it’s common knowledge in political spaces.

Lol nice projection, my guy. Can't take the trolling so he throws a tantrum. Can't take the L when you've bough the whole supply.

Sure, pal. Of course you did.

Bro just take the L and move on with your life…