Imgflip Logo Icon

It’s only 8.50 and money goes to shelters.

It’s only 8.50 and money goes to shelters. | BUT IT ONLY APPLIES TO PEOPLE WITH CATS AND DOGS WHO DON’T HAVE A VET. COLORADO BIG GOV GONNA CHARGE A TAX FOR OWNING PETS! BILL BAD! | image tagged in npc meme,taxes,dogs,cats,maga | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
109 views 4 upvotes Made by AlumaEnbo66 3 months ago in politics
NPC Meme memeCaption this Meme
18 Comments
2 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
Libs have never seen a tax on others that they didn’t love
2 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
The point of the tax was to ge the pets registered with a vet. If it’s registered with a vet then there’s no tax or fine.

If you don’t a have vet for your cat or dog then what are you gonna do when you need one.
2 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
If I were to need one I would do like I do now.call around to see if they are taking on new patients,
2 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
Yeah that’s gonna do a lot of good in an emergency situation or end of life care.
But also it just helps cut down on animal abuse.
2 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
If only Jim Coates had registered with the local vet.
2 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
Alright ngl this one’s going over my head what does a Yankees player from the 30s have to with this? Or is there someone else with a similar name that I’m completely unaware of?
2 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
Jim Coates was the dad in the movie old yeller
0 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
Ah Okay but wasn’t that set in the 1860s?

I mean now adays yes absolutely he should have because a rabies vaccine meant Old yeller would have lived in a modern setting.

But first rabies vaccine for dogs didnt come out until 1885 with next major one being in 1908?
1 up, 3mo,
1 reply
And back then he didn’t have to worry about the government putting another restriction on his free choice
0 ups, 3mo,
1 reply
I mean yes but you are just proving my point…

Some people are choosing to not get their pets care…and this isn’t the days of old yeller where one bite is a death sentence and a 5 dollar shot can prevent an awful tragedy…

This tax forces owners to at least register so they don’t have to potentially suffer with a horrible preventable brain melting illness like rabies…which is a fate I wouldn’t wish anyone.

“I don’t want government telling me I need to take my pet to a vet even if means they’ll suffer.” Is a choice but man is that hell of a weird hill to die on…
1 up, 3mo
You still don’t get it do you?
1 up, 3mo,
3 replies
Just another attempt to control your life for you.
2 ups, 3mo
Or maybe they are making sure animals with owners can get medical attention they need?

Just spit balling.
1 up, 3mo,
2 replies
This just in: a state charging you for not making sure your pet can get medical attention when needed is the libs controlling your life. Tune in next time to see if someone can make a more insane take than this shit.
1 up, 3mo
Blah, blah, blah,bullshit, blah, blah, blah.
0 ups, 3mo
Ignore my last post wrong dude my b.
1 up, 3mo,
1 reply
Yep…libs love that shit
1 up, 3mo
Of course they do. They really believe that if the pet hasn’t previously been registered with a vet that there is no care available. It’s just another way to control your actions. It’s not the pet life they are concerned with, it’s your life.
NPC Meme memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
BUT IT ONLY APPLIES TO PEOPLE WITH CATS AND DOGS WHO DON’T HAVE A VET. COLORADO BIG GOV GONNA CHARGE A TAX FOR OWNING PETS! BILL BAD!