It seems to follow.

Apples and oranges

More like apples and apples

Lemme explain why I believe tranwomen being transmen are apples and oranges: transwomen are people who identify as female who were born male, yet transmen are people who identify as male who were born as female.

As for intersex people, they are not transgender...

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2018/10/its-intersex-awareness-day-here-are-5-myths-we-need-to-shatter/

A definition is not an explanation.
If a person can identify as whatever biological sex they wish with no other rationale other than it is whatever they say, there is no meaning to the language used. Trans-whatever can be tran-whatever. There is concrete meaning.
What if a person is born female, identifies as male, then later identifies as female. They are a transmaletransfemale.

"A definition is not an explanation."

I know, but just don't get too technical.

"If a person can identify as whatever biological sex they wish with no other rationale other than it is whatever they say, there is no meaning to the language used. Trans-whatever can be tran-whatever. There is concrete meaning."

Sex and gender are literally different things. No one is born with a gender, yet before they were born everyone's sex was female until they had their male genitals developed. Technically, everyone is born agender, which can mean no gender.

"What if a person is born female, identifies as male, then later identifies as female. They are a transmaletransfemale."

No, they just return to being cisgender, which is exactly what conservatives want

This is what is so funny about you gender cultists; you claim that gender and sex are different when you're trapped. If gender and sex are disconnected, then a transwoman is not a real woman. Transmen aren't real men. You know this, so does the rest of the rational world.
Further, if the silly linguistic gymnastics used to obfuscate clear reality hold any meaning, in your deluded world, a person identifying as a gender that is opposite of their biology IS, in fact, that opposite biology. Therefore, if they later choose to identify as the only other biological reality, they can't have reverted rather, they changed anew. It's asinine.