TO UNDERSTAND THE JEWISH POSITION ABOUT THE FRANK-PHAGAN AFFAIR, WE WILL CLOSELY EXAMINE, FACT-CHECK, AND ANALYZE EVERY JEWISH WORK AND TREATMENT ABOUT THE CASE SINCE 1913, INCLUDING MATERIALS BY NON-JEWS SUPPORTING THE COMMONLY HELD JEWISH CONSENSUS OF THE CASE. THE NEARLY MONOLITHIC POSITION OF WELL-ORGANIZED JEWRY IN ACADEMIA, MEDIA, AND GOVERNMENT OFFICE HAS REMAINED THE SAME SINCE THE BEGINNING: LEO FRANK, THEY PROPOUND, WAS NOT SO MUCH PROSECUTED AS HE WAS PERSECUTED. MOREOVER, “LEO FRANK WAS WRONGFULLY CONVICTED” IS THE CENTRAL SLOGAN OF JEWISH ACADEMICS AND LAW PROFESSORS WITH SEMANTIC VARIATIONS OF THIS STATEMENT REVERBERATING IN THEIR PUBLISHED WORKS. FOR THE FIRST HALF CENTURY FOLLOWING THE LYNCHING OF LEO FRANK, THE GREAT UNDERLYING URGE TO MAKE THE CASE A CENTRAL ORGAN OF JEWISH ACTIVISM HAD BEEN REPEATEDLY SUPPRESSED BY THE SOUTHERN JEWISH COMMUNITY AND NATIONAL LEADERS OUT OF RESPECT FOR THE AGING GERMAN JEWS OF ATLANTA WHO PRESSED HARD FOR THE ISSUE TO NOT BE RAISED.