Putin's good at unjustified imprisonment.
Like Putin, Trump wanted to continue to pursue HRC after she had cooperated with the Tea Party Republicans with regard to Benghazi, and had spent *hours* testifying and speaking to members of congress. In all cases, there was nothing criminal found with which to land an indictment for her actions (or lack thereof.) In spite of this, Trump's 2016 campaign was built upon "Lock her up."
In contrast, I am saying let Trump raise his defense. He had his days in court for his election fraud allegations (which were rejected due to a lack of merit). Now, those prosecuting will get their day in court. From the sounds of it, a Grand Jury sounds like they've voted to agree with the prosecution to indict Donald Trump.
If you believe there is corruption, I implore you to get to the bottom of it and raise those concerns with the authorities. Though, if for some reason you raise the claim that everyone at every level is corrupted because they denied you, it'd be met with some skepticism. At that point, you're welcome to investigate said corruption and prove that it's there.
A good example of corruption would be Trump trying to place doubt on anyone who testified against him and starting a PR campaign to slander their reputation in spite of swearing testimony under oath or firing anyone who doesn't agree with him, especially members of our armed forces who are currently serving and casting doubt on them out of hand.
To further look at Trump's inconsistency in telling the truth, we can simply look at Truth social where in January he said the issue with Stormy Daniels happened a long time ago and has exceeded the statute of limitations while in this month he has said it never happened.
Caption this Meme
