1) It's not my fault you don't know how to use the pronoun "your" and I'm not gonna bend the way I say things for you.
2) It's called slang. I could've called you worse. (Pet-ophile, Fur-retards, Furrgots, hairballs, etc.)
3) I'm not believing the story that it was a joke. Otherwise, you would've said that it was a joke in the very first comment. The old "It was just a joke" retreat tells me you're losing the arguement. That and the fact you're trying to win via pointing out spelling mistakes.
4) So the images that I mention aren't supposed to be images I saw? Again, the furry community is mostly sexual. Lots of people say this, including the rare furries that aren't horny about it and just make furry ocs.
5) The reason I didn't want to be a furry is because of what I saw. (It was a furry who showed me what a furry was in the first place, mind you) Yiff, furry sex, gay furry sex, and of course, zoophilia. When I was showed this (by a "totally not sexual" furry) I was horrified. Furry community not sexual my f**king ass.
6) Yes, I did say read the title. The title says, and I quote: "In some cases they [rare bunch of furries] actually are not, but these are exceptions" This was my disclaimer. You just didn't take the time to read the title.
7) I'm just not believing that what you said was a joke. Otherwise you would've said you were joking after my first reply. I would've given an awkward apology, and all's well that ends well. But no, you contuined the arguement. Now, just admit it: you didn't take the time to read the title, got pissed, and decided to argue. I started to win, so you tried to win via pointing out spelling errors (Which by the way, furrys is another plural term) which is a stupid method, as you are not solving the problem, defeating a point or making one and trying to make me feel bad by saying it was a joke.
Caption this Meme