Imgflip Logo Icon

sprite cranberry is a W see?

sprite cranberry is a W see? | image tagged in sprite cranberry | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
2,286 views 2 upvotes Made by SpookyFoxy 2 years ago in MS_memer_group
Sprite Cranberry :) memeCaption this Meme
114 Comments
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Shore man. But lick this grenade first
0 ups, 2y
deal
[deleted]
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
ew furry
1 up, 2y
skill issue
1 up, 2y,
3 replies
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
No furry, only Skyline
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
no duh but it aint gonna kill the r34 or the person inside it
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
It would if it can penetrate tank armour
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
i dont think u understand, tank is big slow and not very maneuverable
r34 big speed and very maneuverable
r34 out moves tank
something designed to hit a tank not hit r34 bc r34 better
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
I agree that the GT-R R34 is better but you don't want to underestimate an ATGM
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
im not underestimating bc r34 go vroom then go skiiirt then miss
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Alr then, a BGM-71 TOW from a helicopter
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
the draft from the heli would f**k up the missile lmao
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
no
0 ups, 2y
yuh
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
skylines are rlly cool
but furry skylines are kinda better
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
If I ever see one I'm using the FGM-148
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
really? on a skyline r34?? they are built for tanks not skylines the r34 would easily out maneuver the missile
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
The missile is laser guided, it's hard for it to miss
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
its hard for it to miss a tank, an r34 can just pull 180 or slam on the brakes while going 50+
boom
dodged
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
BGM-71 TOW
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
?
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Bigger missile with more explosive power
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
bigger=harder to maneuver
so r34 is a-okay
0 ups, 2y
Also both the missiles don't have to hit to detonate and kill the target
0 ups, 2y
also RIP ken block
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y,
3 replies
Sorry I don’t speak zoophile
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
naahhh bro still that dumb
do i need to explain why furries are not zoophiles to you?
[deleted]
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
It’s a photo of a dog literally sucking someone’s willy wonka sounds like zoophile art to me
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
thats not a dog?
thats a furry?
and thats some sprite cranberry
[deleted]
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Sprite cranberry doesn’t cover enough I can see it
But still furry is technically animal so like
Anime “drinking sprite cranberry” is kinda sus to me
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
you cant see a cock in that image???
and a furry is not an animal at all
would you like me to prove that to you?
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Ya you can see it kinda
But bro that’s still an animal and when I say furry I mean fictional furry
0 ups, 2y,
2 replies
you cant see it at all?!?!?! are you good???
its not an animal and i see i need to explain it
ok so a furry is an anthropomorphic animal, what does that mean? they are a human with animal characteristics or the other way around i forgor
but furries have human abilites
furries act like humans (talking and walking a clothing), have human organs, and look more on the human side, meaning they are much more human
also furry and fictional furry are the same? idk what tf u mean
[deleted]
1 up, 2y,
7 replies
Idk if you blind or something or you think he has an abnormally large and round tongue that got stuck in a can that obviously looks photoshopped
Also
Furry logic: animal porn is ok if the animals have human hands and are hyper-oversexualized Hmm yes.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
wdym “any sexually aggressive image that resembles a minor falls under the category of child porn” im talking abt teens, i think u just misunderstood that, it means any porn that looks like the person involved is under the age of 13 is child porn bc they are a minor but if they look 13+ its not bc their a teen and also have u never seen the teen section of PH?🤨
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y
I literally just quoted a legal document bro

And what I meant by that was you said “so even though that 21 year old looks 16 porn of them is OK because they arent 16”
It still resembles a minor, which in many cases could make it illegal
yes 16 year olds are minors.
Unless you Bri’ish or something.

Note: you threw in the anime girl part which is what I meant by that statement. Real life stuff doesn’t really count because there’s actual evidence backing up the age if necessary.
0 ups, 2y
its not
0 ups, 2y,
2 replies
then skill issue bc
[deleted]
1 up, 2y
Let’s hope it’s just a phase
0 ups, 2y,
2 replies
if it were illegal then i wouldnt be able to go to pornhub and find it
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y
https://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/is-it-legal-to-draw-fictional-minors-in-nsfw--5156534.html

https://www.shouselaw.com/ca/blog/is-loli-illegal-in-the-united-states/

https://www.houston-criminalattorney.com/is-lolicon-legal-in-the-united-states/

https://www.robertmhelfend.com/criminal-defense/sex-crimes/lolicon-illegal/

https://anthonyricciolaw.com/is-lolicon-legal-in-the-us/

Don’t ask me how you were able to find lolicon in phub
0 ups, 2y
L foxy
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
bro first one i went to said it isnt??
"Otherwise, simple possession of loli is not illegal under federal law"
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y
Keep reading. It still violates some laws in other ways
0 ups, 2y,
2 replies
its not an animal dawg?
let me explain this to you one level dumber
just hang on and read carefully so you understand
lets say a furry looks like an animal and thats why you say it is zoophilia ok?
got that?
now lets look at some anime girl or even a real life girl, they look 16 but are actually 21
porn with/of them would not be considered pedophilia
this is all mutually agreed right?
so even though that 21 year old looks 16 porn of them is OK because they arent 16
now
furries are not animals alright?
so even though they LOOK like animals they are not
therefore it is not zoophilia
if you need more help getting it explained ask me
0 ups, 2y
you know all about hentai dont you
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y
Well the pedophilia comparison isn’t really valid because “any sexually aggressive image that resembles a minor falls under the category of child porn”

But I get what you’re trying to say
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
i honestly dont know if i can dumb it down anymore
legit everyone that ive ever said this to before has gotten it as its simpler than walking
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y
Ik that stuff is allowed because “it’s not a real animal”
We just tired of seeing yiff and we don’t like it
0 ups, 2y,
4 replies
mood
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
u said i must know alot abt hentie
0 ups, 2y
hentai, not anime.
0 ups, 2y
oh furry art isnt hentai
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
hentai is anime tho
like 75% sure
0 ups, 2y
i'm talking abou the art
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
i am not into anime
ive just explained this same concept to so many idiots that ive found this is the best way to explain it bc most are weebs or some shit
0 ups, 2y
i didnt say you were?
mood
0 ups, 2y,
2 replies
also another one of the sites u gave
"Based on SCOTUS’ decision in Ashcroft, hentai is one form of virtual child pornography that is legal, provided the children depicted are fictitious."
are u on my side now???
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y,
2 replies
Hang on let me see what you saying now
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
they all are on my side(from the 3 ive looked at)💀
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y
Read my boy
0 ups, 2y
like im against loli and idfk how this turned into this but like, huh??!??!
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
“Yes, Lolicon—animated renderings of kids engaged in sex—is illegal in the United States, just like all other forms of child porn.

Making, possessing, and/or distributing child pornography is against state and federal laws. All photographs and videos of children engaged in sexual activity, even simulated activity, are classified as child porn. Because of this, “lolicon,” which is animated child pornography, is also illegal. If you have been charged with creating, possessing, or distributing animated child porn, you need to seek legal assistance immediately to negate the outcome of the charges against you.”

“Lolicon is classified as illegal child pornography under federal law in the United States. This means that these cases are typically investigated by federal agents, such as the FBI, and they are prosecuted in federal courts.

A first-time federal conviction for possession of child pornography typically carries a prison sentence of between 5 and 20 years. However, sentences can range as high as life imprisonment for aggravating factors like:

The images are violent, sadistic or masochistic or
The defendant has prior convictions for child sexual exploitation.“

“ Possession of loli is illegal under federal law if two conditions are met:

First, the anime depiction of an underage person is obscene or lacking serious value.
Second, the anime was either transmitted through the mail, internet or common carrier; was transported across state lines; or there are indications that the possessor intends to distribute or sell it.
Otherwise, simple possession of loli is not illegal under federal law. But if a person possesses a large amount of loli, prosecutors will likely infer that he/she intends to sell or distribute it. And unless the defendant created the loli images him/herself, prosecutors may have an easy time proving that the defendant received the loli over the internet or through the mail.”

“ Cartoon pornography depicting minors is Child Pornography. If you make it, it is a federal felony. If you possess it, it is another federal felony. If you send it to someone else, it is yet another federal felony.

Section 1466A of Title 18, United State Code, makes it illegal for any person to knowingly produce, distribute, receive, or possess with intent to transfer or distribute visual representations, such as drawings, cartoons, or paintings that appear to depict minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct and are deemed obscene.”
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
idk how we got to this but as you can see all of what you just said is if it is deemed obscene, if it isnt then it is not illegal
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Never mentioned anything about non obscene art. The whole topic is about you defending loli hentai despite the fact I just gave you multiple sources from lawyers that state it’s illegal.

If you continue to defend loli hentai then I will do everything I can to stop you.

There is no justification for illegal mental disorders in my world
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
omg
i disapprove of loli
but it is not illegal if not found obscene, and it did mention abt it, the very last sentence in ur essay "Section 1466A of Title 18, United State Code, makes it illegal for any person to knowingly produce, distribute, receive, or possess with intent to transfer or distribute visual representations, such as drawings, cartoons, or paintings that appear to depict minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct and are deemed obscene." meaning if not found obscene it is not illegal
now im done with this
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Bro do you even know what obscene means

Note: The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that obscene applies to materials that appeal predominantly to a prurient interest in sexual conduct, depict or describe sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, and lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value

because of you stating “ so even though that 21 year old looks 16 porn of them is OK because they arent 16”
This is why I’m doing this bro

Stop trying to chicken out until you realize what I’m trying to say
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
obscene definition: (of the portrayal or description of sexual matters) offensive or disgusting by accepted standards of morality and decency.
if it is not accepted by standards of morality and decency it is not illegal
i understand what your saying and that it is wrong
you proved yourself wrong in that damn message
it says "obscene APPLIES TO" not what obscene is, i think you just misunderstood
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
I searched “what does obscene mean sexually” and that was the top result.
Obscene has another meaning for sexual matters. In this case, it applies to the loli hentai cases
0 ups, 2y,
2 replies
thats not what it means by that dude
here is the def: (of the portrayal or description of sexual matters) offensive or disgusting by accepted standards of morality and decency.
now that part in parentheses is the part you are trying to say is the definition
it is not the def
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y
Obscene is considered a homonym, which means it has the same spelling and pronunciation but has different definitions and Parentheses are usually show in a definition to indicate that there’s another meaning for it

Cambridge: offensive, rude, or shocking, usually because of being too obviously related to sex or showing sex:

Dictionary.com: offensive to morality or decency; indecent; depraved:
obscene language.
causing uncontrolled sexual desire.
abominable; disgusting; repulsive.

Collins: offensive to one's feelings, or to prevailing notions, of modesty or decency; lewd · disgusting; repulsive ; offensive to morality or decency; indecent; depraved

Oxford learners: connected with sex in a way that most people find offensive
obscene gestures/language/books
an obscene phone call (= in which somebody says obscene things)
The book was declared obscene. (Other definitions were included as well)
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y
Do some research before you start spitting
got zamn
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
same site said this?
"The PROTECT Act was passed in the aftermath of a Supreme Court case that had held that completely virtual child pornography was protected free speech under the First Amendment, so long as it was not obscene."
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y
Yeah I didn’t mean to put that websites link in there
Show More Comments
Sprite Cranberry :) memeCaption this Meme
NSFW
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator