It's not even against the terms of use either. It says you can post stuff like this with a scientific purpose.

exactly

…and you refuse to censor it the second time

i don't have to. it was with a scientific purpose so it isn't against the rules

Still gonna turn someone on

bruh how the f**k is someone gonna get turned on by a graph-

“ Imgflip is not a pornographic website. All private parts must be fully covered. People in bikinis or other minimal clothing are OK if parts are still fully covered, but they must be marked NSFW. Artistic works with nudity that are not sexually suggestive are OK, but must be marked NSFW. Health or educational content with nudity that is not sexually suggestive is OK, but must be marked NSFW.” is ok as long as it there are no sexual body parts in it. All body parts must be covered, therefore my decision as a moderator against that image was correct

“Health or educational content with nudity that is not sexually suggestive is OK, but must be marked NSFW.” it was not sexually suggestive it did not encourage it in any way shape or form

just because it wasn’t sexually suggestive, it says all private parts MUST BE fully covered.

it said WITH NUDITY. WITH NUDITY IT WAS OK BRUH. YOU ARE DOING THE WRONG THING BECAUSE I AM SAFE WITH THIS BOUNDARY

What part of "it must be covered" do you not understand?

fr