Depends. There’s the toxic kind and the normal kind, wait, who am I kidding? No one’s normal…Anyway, The toxic kind is attraction to the Minecrafter and is not LGBTQ. Then there’s the not toxic kind. Basically this one means
I mean dream is one person so to build an entire sexuality around attraction to one content creator seems a little creepy, especially since people seem to forget that he’s a real person who probably doesn’t feel comfortable with this
If you mean the YouTuber, that's a definite NO. sexuality is a category under which you fit that defines who you're attracted to sexually and as Dream is not a gender, he I a person, that would be like me having a crush on some kid called James (idk) and calling myself Jamessexual. In conclusion, dreamsexuality is not valid in terms of the YouTuber
Well, there are two kinds.
The one where someone is sexually attracted to Dream, no, that's fake and invalid.
The one that's a version of aceflux, where someone only feels sexual attraction in dreams, is valid.
I’m pretty sure dreamsexual is kinda unhealthy because you develop an unhealthy, one sided relationship with unreciprocated feelings. Some people can even get obsessive about this. Idk about the whole lgbtq+ community but that’s my opinion