Depends. There’s the toxic kind and the normal kind, wait, who am I kidding? No one’s normal…Anyway, The toxic kind is attraction to the Minecrafter and is not LGBTQ. Then there’s the not toxic kind. Basically this one means

Ok then I mean the toxic kind.

The toxic kind? No, not LGBTQ.

Your only attracted to people in your dreams, and is LGBTQ.

But ppl identifying as it doesn't make much sense

I dunno, but I’m pretty sure it is considered LGBTQ.

It is but nobody identifies as it since having sexual attraction is something that happens to everyone and shouldn't be a sexuality

Well now, Asexual experience little to no sexual attraction so that isn’t completely true…And I’m sure someone is the valid Dreamsexual.

Well they shouldn't be than
(No offense but that shouldn't actually be a sexuality)

I think…

The real one: Sure.
The one about the youtuber: Nah.

I’m pretty sure dreamsexual is kinda unhealthy because you develop an unhealthy, one sided relationship with unreciprocated feelings. Some people can even get obsessive about this. Idk about the whole lgbtq+ community but that’s my opinion

If you mean the YouTuber, that's a definite NO. sexuality is a category under which you fit that defines who you're attracted to sexually and as Dream is not a gender, he I a person, that would be like me having a crush on some kid called James (idk) and calling myself Jamessexual. In conclusion, dreamsexuality is not valid in terms of the YouTuber

HELL NO
Dreamsexuality is not a real sexuality and is 100% NOT valid

no

Well, there are two kinds.
The one where someone is sexually attracted to Dream, no, that's fake and invalid.
The one that's a version of aceflux, where someone only feels sexual attraction in dreams, is valid.

I’m talking about the YouTuber one

The YouTuber one is invalid

Depends on the meaning
But I also think super straights aren't that bad...

They'd be ok if they didn't run all their homophobia and transphobia in all our faces.

I’m pretty sure most of us don’t, but idk

THANK YOU

I mean dream is one person so to build an entire sexuality around attraction to one content creator seems a little creepy, especially since people seem to forget that he’s a real person who probably doesn’t feel comfortable with this

I think dreamsexual is a real thing where you only feel attraction in dreams but then there’s the one about the YouTube and that one is stupid

I mean the one about the YouTuber

Then yeah that’s not a real sexuality

2 types of them
Invalid and valid
We support the valid one

And I’m assuming the valid one is getting horny while your asleep. That’s the way I’d like to keep it thank you very much

Yes