i need to be so extreme that im considered a threat to most if not all forms of modern governments

good luck :)

Why don't you just call it a day and make your own religion and be a Cult leader?

im antitheist duh

So you can be your own god duh.

thats just satanism basically lol

Pretty much, that's what you are.

lol how?

It's in your title: "i need to be so extreme that im considered a threat to most if not all forms of modern governments" which is just a fancy way of saying "nihilist and anarchist". Ungovernable by any rules of government, do-what-you -will -when -and -where -you -want. Basically being a sociopathic a#$hole. And if you want to be that "exttra-eme" about everything,

ok you got me there
i want a collectivists of egoists in an absolute anarchist society lol

F8ck that noise.

Nothing new is under the sun.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egoist_anarchism

Stirner's philosophy is usually called "egoism". He says that the egoist rejects pursuit of devotion to "a great idea, a good cause, a doctrine, a system, a lofty calling", saying that the egoist has no political calling, but rather "lives themselves out" without regard to "how well or ill humanity may fare thereby".[2] Stirner held that the only limitation on the rights of the individual is one's power to obtain what they desire.[3] He proposes that most commonly accepted social institutions—including the notion of State, property as a right, natural rights in general and the very notion of society—were mere "spooks" in the mind. Stirner wanted to "abolish not only the state but also society as an institution responsible for its members".[4]

Max Stirner's idea of the Union of egoists (German: Verein von Egoisten), was first expounded in The Ego and Its Own. The Union is understood as a non-systematic association, which Stirner proposed in contradistinction to the state.[5] The Union is understood as a relation between egoists which is continually renewed by all parties' support through an act of will.[6] The Union requires that all parties participate out of a conscious egoism. If one party silently finds themselves to be suffering, but puts up and keeps the appearance, the union has degenerated into something else.[6] This union is not seen as an authority above a person's own will. This idea has received interpretations for politics, economics, romance and sex.

Stirner claimed that property comes about through might: "I do not step shyly back from your property, but look upon it always as my property, in which I respect nothing. Pray do the like with what you call my property! [...] What I have in my power, that is my own. So long as I assert myself as holder, I am the proprietor of the thing; [...]. Whoever knows how to take, to defend, the thing, to him belongs property".[7] His concept of "egoistic property" not only rejects moral restraint on how one obtains and uses things, but includes other people as well.[8]

Stirner's philosophy though being individualist, has influenced some libertarian communists and anarcho-communists. Forms of libertarian communism such as insurrectionary anarchism are influenced by Stirner.[9][10] Anarcho-communist Emma Goldman was influenced by both Stirner and Peter Kropotkin and blended their philosophies together in her own.[11]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egoist_anarchism

Johann Kaspar Schmidt (October 25, 1806 – June 26, 1856), better known as Max Stirner (the nom de plume he adopted from a schoolyard nickname he had acquired as a child because of his high brow, which in German is termed Stirn), was a German philosopher, who ranks as one of the literary precursors of nihilism, existentialism, post-modernism and anarchism, especially of individualist anarchism. Stirner's main work is The Ego and Its Own (Der Einzige und sein Eigentum in German, which translates literally as The Only One and his Property). This work was first published in 1844 in Leipzig and has since appeared in numerous editions and translations.

i have his book the ego and its own PDF saved in my bookmarks i was planning on giving it a try

You won't accomplish what you want but by force and violence. And people get hurt from that, it causes misery and destruction, and ultimately death and sends civilization back into the Stone Age and social darwinism where the strongest rule by force and make their own rules no matter how stupid, arbitrary and unjust they are for the people who are subject to them. It's evil and of the anti-Christ. But, silly me, you don't believe in that religious bunk, being anti-theist.

my utopia is classless moneyless stateless i don't wanna be governed i don't wanna see inequalities i want to do whatever i want sometimes being ruled is like herding a group of cattle to the slaughterhouse in todays society if you live in America that's exactly what it is with American capitalism
it makes the workers poor and when they need help they cant get the help they need bc they don't have enough money to get the help so really they are trapped in being quite about there problems and working for someone higher than them bathing in the work the workers have done along with bags of money while the worker watches the workers have been exploited
the workers give their product to the owner and the owner sells it and gets the cash only to give them just barely enough to live off of

violence is needed most times to topple tyrannical govs as thats the point of anarchism and to prevent being sent back to the stone age we become transhumanists and social darwinism would only be done by those groups who get conquered by one another if one fails to have a good military then so be it invade em take there resources and kill those who think our ideology is wrong

No, the point of anarchism is to abolish "all" government, (you said), don't try to sugar-coat it and make it sound noble. You want to destroy law and order for the sake of destroying it. And transhumanism? What kind of pipedream is that? Without a stable society and framework how exactly is that technology going to develop and be manufactured on any kind of a grand scale? if it could happen, what would happen, is the people who have the power, and control (the apex social predators) would have the benefit of the "transhumanism" upgrades, and would exercise and maintain their power over others by restricting its availability. You would have power inequality 100x over what already exists.

well yknow taking and studying is also a thing and not all types of anarchism is absolute they sometimes agree to having a justified form of government example anarcho communism etc and what power there is no power to be taken away and if the ppl in no mans land have access to transhumanist uprgrades then so be it as long as they arent invading the society its good and even if they did the people would put an end to it easily

social Darwinism is good if it kills a group of ppl i think its a good idea it would benifit society but the only way for social Darwinism to prosper is in an absolute anarchist society no rules no nothing
but let's dive deeper let's say we wanna be globalists anarcho-communists who are collectivists with egoists and social Darwinists
you have a large scale classless moneyless and stateless society being run thru dir democracy and there is a system implemented to get rid of laziness (if you can work and don't choose to you get cut off from society's help until you work) and casted out
and ofc there is gonna be others cast out from other areas so it's like no man's land no rules and is absolute anarchy true anarchy where ppl fight and murder each other so thats where the social Darwinism thrives the most and if the harsh conditions are enough to make a person come back and work then it works and makes ppl work Detering laziness and production is at maximum

Then there is no "society" if everyone does their own thing and is living by their own rules. Your ideas make no sense they are full of contradictions. To Quote, Stirner, your hero:
<< He proposes that most commonly accepted social institutions—including the notion of State, property as a right, natural rights in general and the very notion of society—were mere "spooks" in the mind. Stirner wanted to "abolish not only the state but also society as an institution responsible for its members">>

Anarchy means no society. And what do you mean, "social darwinism is good if it kills a group of people" You know that's what sent millions of people to Hitler's gas chamber.

no natural selection its an instinct telling you to kill hitler did a genocide completely different from social Darwinism/natural selection he commanded ppl to do it animals dont command others to kill mass amounts of ppl

and let me reword there is absolute anarchism no rules no nothing this means the natural selection is everywhere death is high etc but in most cases, anarchism allows justified versions of government if the ppl so decides to do so or in other words collectivize into a group which means it's a small government where the government barely has any power and ofc there comes with rules that is decided by the collective thru democracy a society is starting to form from this and for a society to stay together and not collapse ppl start taking on roles or jobs and some may pick technology some may pick volunteer military, etc its ppl falling in line by there own choice and now if someone decides not to work they are gonna get kicked out of society and left in a place where it is absolute anarchy so by seeing "oh I don't wanna be kicked out of the collective I wanna do my part to get my needs fulfilled by the collective while also providing for them" not all anarchism is just ppl running around killing raping and murdering

now there are multiple forms of anarchism
-anarcho communism
-anarcho capitalism
-anarcho collectivism
-anarcho feminism
-anarcho queerism
-anarcho egoism
the list goes on

also let me reword that last part you have mentioned
it kills the weak ppl and let the strong pass on there genetics to a future generation and further down the line they basically are at the top of the food chain strong smart fast ppl are good when it comes to a collective just imagine a collective of supermen being able to do things 5 generations ago couldnt even come close to doing its amazing and with technological advances added onto that like mechanical exo suits etc society would be at it top when it comes to production