I never said that, I only said Danny basically sexualizes the crap out of art by minors. And secondly, he’s an adult, they’re children. The situation is less potential pedophilia and more just being fatherless. The argument of “he can simps for child art because that one 10 year old girl simps for someone in Pokémon which is made by adults” is bs. You know that. I know that. Next argument?