Congressman Napoleon announcement

After the election, Fidel and I were having a talk.
We were discussing the election on How IOF could've won with CSP's support but then the CP's memechat empire won.

I am really starting to get suspicious of some of these CP puppet voters.
https://imgflip.com/user/Gru.
https://imgflip.com/user/Operator_bravo.26
https://imgflip.com/user/McKennzo

I might have to start investigating some of these users' History with the stream and see what they had done. I don't understand why a CP puppet voter would come here and just vote and not do actual stuff in this stream.

I do think there should be some rules when it comes to voting on this stream. Maybe I will hold a bill on this later

Wasn't this why the voter ID / Imgflip DMV requirement exists?

i do suggest a rule where if you want to vote you need to be active for more than 2 weeks to vote

Yeah, we should pass a bill like that.

its the only way we can get rid of IG's memechat empire from being able to just vote and leave

Yep.

IG is the only one who is trying to build up the stream with new members. He has no control if they stay active or not. If the stream isn't interesting they are going to leave. This stream has a bunch of cliques which are off-putting to new members. If you want more participants make the stream more attractive.
I also think that's it's not just CP voters who are seldom active. Are these "new rules" (which are not in the Constitution btw) just going to be applied to CP voters or other parties members who are hardly ever on the stream? This sounds like people just want to remove CP voters so they have a chance to win an election.

well we passed a bill saying nothing specified directly directed solely to CP voters but i did mention why i think its a good idea as im apposed to CP

Making rules that apply to only one group of people (who you don't happen to like) is corrupt. How would you like it if rules were made to be only against you or your party. Rules need to be applied equitably across the whole population.

i said why i agree with it not why the entirety agrees with it
their is nothing on the bill saying this is only limited to CP members

It might not read that way on the bill, but that doesn't mean that members won't collude to do that in practice. The fact that's it's being boldly discussed in this stream leaves me very suspicious.

well the bill wasnt meant to be directly for CP members but that was in my mind when i agreed to the bill being passed

I dunnow. Maybe have a platform that attracts voters? Just spit-ballin' here.
Or, I suppose you could collude with other members to try and unfairly remove voters from a targeted political party.

Interesting. Now how do we actually enforce any of this?

I'll figure it out

Alrighty.