A) You have no idea what you’re talking about because B) this nation’s greatest period of economic growth was post World War II when C) this country’s highest tax rate was over 90% and D) billionaires were STILL billionaires even paying that rate.
E) Ronald Reagan campaigned on a platform of “smaller government” and played the race card to drop the tax rates for his golf buddies so they can slash welfare programs for minorities. In the meantime, government grew 6% under his regime (https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/12/ronald-reagan-big-government-legacy/) and he tripled the federal deficit.
Ain’t it amazing that the country needed a tax-and-spend Democrat to balance the budget? Thank William Jefferson Clinton.
As to the rest of your response, you need to study harder because you are so far out of your depth, I can’t even see you anymore. Lower taxes doesn’t improve anything. As a matter of fact, trickle-down economics has hurt the US (and the world for that matter) and contributed directly to income equality, which leads to class warfare, which doesn’t lead anywhere good.
Here’s one of the most comprehensive reports on the subject: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/107919/1/Hope_economic_consequences_of_major_tax_cuts_published.pdf
California isn’t a hippie-liberal hell, junior. Try actually visiting there before making a broad, sweeping statement that makes you sound like an ignorant ass.