They call multiculturalism "diversity" but the end result is actually the complete opposite.

When you seen the recent video of a French old man be grabbed and made to run beside the car until he falls just for laughs. Yea they might not be assimilating that well if it is becoming a trend. Not even mentioning the other crap that’s been going on there for years

Nah France is still 95% European.

Firstly, it's more like 88%. Secondly, that number is much smaller in younger generations. Thirdly, the foreign population is rising exponentially while the European percentage of the population is falling. And finally, much of the muslim population isn't assimilating at all, but are instead forming their own communities.

But why are you so worried?

These are illegal immigrants who are refusing to assimilate, with many of them becoming violent criminals and radicalised terrorists. As a result France is losing its cultural identity and becoming a less safe place to live. What isn't there to be worried about?

Refusing to assimilate? Idk man, sounds a lot like the people that get mad that people don’t wear masks who “Refuse to comply and assimilate”

Foreigners who live in these countries should only do so on the condition that they acknowledge it is a Western, Christian society. If they want to have a muslim community without assimilating into the culture of the nation that has accommodated them with the citizens' taxpayer money, they can do so elsewhere. These are overwhelmingly young male economic migrants who have entered the country illegally. We have no idea who these people are but they're being housed in four star hotels while actual British citizens are still left homeless. That just isn't right.

A nation should look after their people first and foremost, I agree, but turning away immigrants based solely apon their religion is disgusting. That’s North Korea energy.

Besides, this so-called “invasion” of Muslims and other religious types only make up 6.3% of all the UK’s population. That’s nothing. Besides, Christians make up 53.6%, so the precious national identity is going absolutely nowhere. In fact, if there’s an invasion, I would look towards the 40.2% of non-religious types, they’re gaining ground rapidly.

Why are you so concerned anyway? You’ve been blessed to be born in a country with an unemployment rate of 4.2%. There’s been no serious wars so far affecting Britain since the 40s.

For once, imagine that you were forced to flee from your home, that you weren’t born with all this sheer luck, and imagine being turned down at the border because you believed in a different god.

Wow

"A nation should look after their people first and foremost, I agree, but turning away immigrants based solely apon their religion is disgusting. That’s North Korea energy."

Indeed. Thank you for randomly pointing out something I already agree with and never argued against but ok lol

"Besides, this so-called “invasion” of Muslims and other religious types only make up 6.3% of all the UK’s population. That’s nothing. Besides, Christians make up 53.6%, so the precious national identity is going absolutely nowhere. In fact, if there’s an invasion, I would look towards the 40.2% of non-religious types, they’re gaining ground rapidly."

Most of the UK's population growth is now driven by immigration, in London and many other cities indigenous Brits are already a minority, and the same applies for younger generations. By 2040 that will apply to the entire population.

"Why are you so concerned anyway? You’ve been blessed to be born in a country with an unemployment rate of 4.2%. There’s been no serious wars so far affecting Britain since the 40s."

A large majority of these illegal immigrants don't work, stabbing crime is high as ever thanks to Sadiq Khan's incompetence, and "diversity quotas" have resulted in White people unfairly losing their jobs.

"For once, imagine that you were forced to flee from your home, that you weren’t born with all this sheer luck, and imagine being turned down at the border because you believed in a different god."

Again, why are you randomly talking about being turned away because of religious beliefs? No one ever said anything about rejecting immigrants because of their religion.

“ If they want to have a muslim community without assimilating into the culture of the nation that has accommodated them with the citizens' taxpayer money, they can do so elsewhere.”

You said it yourself, clear as crystal.

First of all, most “indigenous” (I’m going to assume you mean white, because we all know you meant white) Brits, were rare ever since the Saxons rolled up. White Britons are just a mixed bunch of Germanic, Nordic, Roman, Celtic, and French. If you want to find pure blood Celtic, they’re probably still up north.

“ A large majority of these illegal immigrants don't work”
They can’t work normal, 9-5 jobs because they are illegal. They also can’t claim benefits, and other “UK taxpayer money”, since they’re illegal. I know many illegal immigrants, and many do work, but it’s unregistered, and cash in hand.

“Most of the UK's population growth is now driven by immigration”
Because the “Indigenous” population is ageing fast. A study shows, and I quote ‘In 2020, there were approximately 938.7 thousand people who were aged 55 in the United Kingdom, the most of any age in this year. The next most common age was 53, and 54 respectively, with 934.7 and 932.6 thousand people this age in 2020.’
Without immigration, face it, the UK would be an old man’s country.

"You said it yourself, clear as crystal."

I said that radical muslims who refuse to assimilate should go elsewhere. I didn't say that all muslims should be turned away.

"First of all, most “indigenous” (I’m going to assume you mean white, because we all know you meant white) Brits, were rare ever since the Saxons rolled up. White Britons are just a mixed bunch of Germanic, Nordic, Roman, Celtic, and French. If you want to find pure blood Celtic, they’re probably still up north."

Firstly, the Romans, the Saxons, and the Normans were not "immigrants"—they invaded Britain, and didn't even change the bloodline significantly. Secondly, up until after WWII and the passing of the 1948 Nationality Act Britain was one of the most homogenous nations on earth. Thirdly, just because a country has had immigrants in the past, it’s no reason to keep on having immigrants. And finally, you said yourself that I was referring to White people, and I don't disagree; the indigenous British population can be described as part of the Northwest European category.

"They can’t work normal, 9-5 jobs because they are illegal. They also can’t claim benefits, and other “UK taxpayer money”, since they’re illegal. I know many illegal immigrants, and many do work, but it’s unregistered, and cash in hand."

And yet they're housed in four star hotels while actual British citizens are still left homeless. It's bad enough that we're losing our cultural identity, but the government is also treating us like second-class citizens in our own country.

"Without immigration, face it, the UK would be an old man’s country."

What, are you an ageist or something?