Read the law.

You have to have a crime before you have a trial. ●Making memes about the AUPs fake ignorance isn't a crime. It's politically protected speech. JOKES about negative IQs aren't TOS violations, they're just funny memes. Obviously funnier to people that UNDERSTAND the joke, but that's splitting hair. ●Making references to people's unfortunate alting behavior isn't a TOS violation either, since I have more than ample evidence of multiple IG alts. This is politically protected speech. ●Memes about long lines at the DMV are as old as time itself. Classic jokes that old and established are certainly not offensive or TOS violations and again: protected political speech. ●The final charge: quoting the law to Incognito, is laughable. It is his responsibility as a political candidate to read the constitution. The constitution that, was made over multiple months and voted on by dozens of people. A president's [fake] inability to read the law would be more likely to show up as evidence against HIM, than the meme lawyer quoting the law to him. Again: political protected speech.