I think if there’s a tie we eliminate all the parties that were not involved with the tie and make their voters vote for one of the parties that is involved in the tie
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
That’s what crazy suggested. It’s a decent idea but I want to see if there’s anything about this in the constitution.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
Ok
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
Oh yeah good point. Like a runoff between the top two (or even three).
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Then we should have a runoff election with the 2 Parties that have tied and then vote for them
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
Crazy and confusion also suggested that. But I wonder what the constitution says.
15 months? It hasn’t been that long. Remember, you went to Kek for 4 months.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
I never said I’ve spent every hour of every day of those 15 months dedicated to becoming President. But I’ve been trying since 15 months ago, which is probably earlier than anyone here.