idk much about Filipino politics tho

Hey ig, can you answer this question for me? Why are conservatives anti abortion, if when people abort, the baby hasn’t even been born yet, not coming out of the mom, but I mean before they even are alive in the moms belly

Why should a baby that has prematurely exited the mother's womb have more worth or humanity than an overdue baby that is just days away from exiting the mother's womb? Humans are alive from the point of conception, because from the point the sperm cell fertilises the egg cell to create a zygote, the unique DNA that makes you who you are is already present. That is the first stage of human life and development, so to have an abortion at any point is to take a human life. This is murder, with only one exception; when there is undeniable scientific proof that the mother will die if the pregnancy continues. Then, and only then, can abortion be considered somewhat justifiable; because in that scenario you are taking one life to save another. But right now an overwhelming majority of abortions are occurring simply because the mother doesn't feel like having a child for personal or financial reasons (and in many cases because she is being pressured into having an abortion by a parent, boyfriend, or husband). Decisions like that need to be made in the bedroom. You can either wear a condom, or preferably just not have sex in the first place (since as a Traditional Catholic I find the use of condoms morally questionable because I believe sex should only ever be done with the intention of having a child). I am also opposed to abortion in cases of rape because no one gets to decide the circumstances under which they are born. A baby conceived from a rape has just as much worth as a baby conceived from consensual intercourse. Abortions can also be avoided shortly after a rape through the use morning-after pills that can prevent conception from ever occurring in the first place; because sperm and egg cells that haven't combined are not human (although I also dislike morning-after pills for the same reason I dislike condoms). Being pro-life doesn't end after birth, which is why I also support providing free morning-after pills to women who have been raped, increased funding to orphanages, and having schools teach teenagers about the benefits of abstinence instead of encouraging birth control.

Because it’s not alive yet.

Did you not read any of that?

I did, im saying when it gets aborted, it’s not alive yet. That’s like saying it’s HORRIBLE for people to be in love and not have a kid, because they don’t have one, which is preventing it.

loll wut? I already said that humanity is most accurately defined by the presence of human DNA, which is there from the point of conception, and you've made no effort whatsoever to address any of my points which puts me under the impression that you didn't really read any of my argument. And as for your bizarre argument that "it’s HORRIBLE for people to be in love and not have a kid" I don't even know where to begin with that one because I never said there is anything wrong with a couple being celibate. I am actually perfectly fine with that. But what's immoral is when a couple has sex but only for pleasure instead of with the intention of having a child (the only exception would be if they're infertile anyway). So I'm very confused by what point you're trying to convey here. You have only repeated the point of unborn babies not being alive over and over again despite my repeated attempts to debunk that point that you have completely ignored.