Imgflip Logo Icon

10-Tier Expanding Brain

10-Tier Expanding Brain | No; Not preferred; I dislike this; I disallow your statement to pass. I do not agree with what you have just said, therefore I am going to have to turn it down. The said statement that you are presenting to me is not preferred to my standards and I do not give you the consent to continue on with said statement. My sense of general being has been disrupted by this statement that my standards of satisfaction are not met, with this statement that you have proposed to me, which I cannot approve of, therefore not being in line with my general principles of relishment. It has come to my attention that from the roots of my subconscious to the core of my sense of awareness, to which, are both intertwined with the ability to manage and differentiate sufficient satisfaction in agreement and hellborn disagreements in said statement, that what you have said to my face is not in agreement with what satisfies my standards, therefore I am going to have to gently put your statement in such a way that it does not relish with my personal self, therefore turning against my hopes in settling with my satisfactions. The statement that you have said to me, cannot be put in such a way that it could settle contently with my subconscious abstract desires and agreements. I cannot allow it to pass through my cerebral cortex, as it meets major conflicts with the desire to agree with your statement. According to passed memories ascending into which I envision as I continue to progress my thought process, which I subconsciously determine my personal opinions and what satisfies my standards of quality interest, this is something that I am going to have to turn down, in regards to how I personally define the word, "adequate" and "satisfaction." I define the word, "adequate," as: Having the qualifications of and/or capability/capabilities to appropriately represent a specific operation. What you have said does not satisfy any of these fully, or at all. I define "satisfaction" as: meeting expectations of needs and/or desires. What you have just said was not sufficient enough to qualify for any of these, therefore I am going to have to stand opposed of said statement. No u | image tagged in 10-tier expanding brain | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
663 views Made by Coco1234 3 years ago in fun
10-Tier Expanding Brain memeCaption this Meme
10-Tier Expanding Brain memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
No; Not preferred; I dislike this; I disallow your statement to pass. I do not agree with what you have just said, therefore I am going to have to turn it down. The said statement that you are presenting to me is not preferred to my standards and I do not give you the consent to continue on with said statement. My sense of general being has been disrupted by this statement that my standards of satisfaction are not met, with this statement that you have proposed to me, which I cannot approve of, therefore not being in line with my general principles of relishment. It has come to my attention that from the roots of my subconscious to the core of my sense of awareness, to which, are both intertwined with the ability to manage and differentiate sufficient satisfaction in agreement and hellborn disagreements in said statement, that what you have said to my face is not in agreement with what satisfies my standards, therefore I am going to have to gently put your statement in such a way that it does not relish with my personal self, therefore turning against my hopes in settling with my satisfactions. The statement that you have said to me, cannot be put in such a way that it could settle contently with my subconscious abstract desires and agreements. I cannot allow it to pass through my cerebral cortex, as it meets major conflicts with the desire to agree with your statement. According to passed memories ascending into which I envision as I continue to progress my thought process, which I subconsciously determine my personal opinions and what satisfies my standards of quality interest, this is something that I am going to have to turn down, in regards to how I personally define the word, "adequate" and "satisfaction." I define the word, "adequate," as: Having the qualifications of and/or capability/capabilities to appropriately represent a specific operation. What you have said does not satisfy any of these fully, or at all. I define "satisfaction" as: meeting expectations of needs and/or desires. What you have just said was not sufficient enough to qualify for any of these, therefore I am going to have to stand opposed of said statement. No u