1. I'm just curious about this one. You avoided my question about eugenics. Why did you bring it up?
2. Who exactly are the "powerful elite"/"them"? Government officials? Powerful corporate executives? Can you please specify?
3. You also say that I can't very "an iota of those precepts" without either saying what precepts and just assuming that I can't prove the hypothetical precepts.
4. While I agree that the government often has and still engages in things that are not in the citizens' best interest, I don't think that vaccines are one of them. First of all, I highly doubt that everyone in government is a corrupt power-hungry machiavellian willing to two-facedly lie about absolutely everything to get more power. Second, the first vaccine was developed by Jonas Salk who was funded by a lot of different sources not just what you'd associate with "powerful elites" like the DT Watson Home for Crippled and a large part of it was also funded via donations from average people.
5. While I think it's good to be skeptical of government and that freedom is important, I don't think we should sacrifice something as helpful to humanity as vaccines on the basis that the US government has sometimes acted in a way that is harmful to its citizens.
5. The Georgia Guidestones are just an unsolved mystery that is in no way regarded as a reliable path for society by anyone. There's also just not really any motivation for the government to mysteriously set up some Guidestones arguing for a globalist government, population control, and whatnot.
6. I agree that Project MK Ultra was a horrible, disgusting, and vile act on part of the US government, but I don't think that that's a reason to hate vaccines.
7. Strawman isn't some conspiracy. It is simply the fact that in a country as vast as the US, some bureaucracy and depersonalization are necessary to manage such a huge number of people. Of course, as you get more local in the bureaucracy, the people under your care are definitely more real rather than impersonal "information." But "strawman" really isn't something meant to help the "powerful elite." Imagine you're responsible for 350 million people. For the vast, VAST majority of them, it will be very hard to understand them beyond that "strawman" of who they really are, but at such an "eye-in-the-sky" view, it's really hard to get a better look.
I'm not trying to be mean. I hope we can get along while we debate :)
