She and I may disagree on stuff all day long, but I like that we'd agree on gov't overreach.

A significant number of today's conservatives were yesterday's liberals and then an event or events happened that inspired them to actually begin LISTENING to what conservatives -- both politicians and pundits -- were saying as opposed to mocking them on kneejerk autopilot according to some leftist approved bullet points script.

Once you actually begin listening and then honestly thinking about what they say and then compare that to the endless LIES funneled your way by the leftist loyal mainstream media and by leftist politicians then gradually you cease being . . . a . . . sheeple.

Governments that aren't even left-leaning in any way are still doing this. It's completely apolitical. This is opposition for the sake of opposition.

Left, right, or whatever government overreach is indeed a bad thing. What this woman is describing is what she sees of the party she supports.

No, she's describing what she sees of the party she's been PLANTED to support. She's anti-union and anti-healthcare; in what POSSIBLE sense could you expect us to believe that she's - in her own words - as left leaning as they come?

She's a plant. Obviously.

We can read her tweets for background.

What's left leaning about her? Name one thing.

From what I can see, she seems to support removing biological sex from birth certificates, but she could be sarcastic. I can only see her tweets up to July 11, but you're right, I can't see much evidence that she'd be super far left. Maybe she's been "red-pilled." Maybe she's a classic liberal/leftist who supports other issues, such as abortion. Maybe she is a plant.

If anything, she does seem to watch Bill Maher, but apparently, that's not even very leftist now.

It's almost as if it never really was in the first place!