All Right Unity Party Head of Congress candidates can try to win over my support in the comments.

Debate questions (courtesy of my good frenemy BeHapp):

1) Why are you running?
2) What is the first thing you want to do in office?
3) What problems do you want to address?
4) Who do you want to select for Congress members?

5) Where do you stand on free speech?
6) Do you think WhiteNat and MoonMan should be banned from the stream?
7) Should someone ever be banned from the stream?

8) What are your thoughts on RichardChill24's impeachment?
9) What are your thoughts on the impeachment process?
10) Would you ever want to impeach somebody?

11) How will you work with the President?
12) What do you think of Congress’s current structure?
13) Do we even need a Congress?

14) Do you suspect some people in the stream of alting?
15) Do you think alting should be illegal?
16) How can you be sure if someone is alting?

17) How do you think voting should be done?
18) What if a conflict in the stream happens?
19) Are you going to be active in the stream?
20) What would you do if you had full control of imgflip?
21) What are the best and worst things about this stream?

22) What is the 1 thing you would like voters to know about you most?

Here you are Mr Guy:
1) I wan’t to try and come onto the stream more and continue the general legacy that previous HOCs have left behind.
2) It really depends on what was currently happening at the time of the election but most likely I would check over the list of members in Congress.
3) The usage of alts in general and alliances with other streams.
4) BeHapp, F1Fan, Luigi and Sugas. I’ll see who the president and VP appoint first so it all depends what happens.

5) 100% with it. Everyone deserves a right to speak and get their opinion or idea forward and should’n’t be silenced.
6) Yes for both.
7) Only people like WN and maybe if Richard went further than he did. Permanent bans should be very rare though.

8) I think he definitely deserved it. He obviously is a troll and wants attention (a bit like WN) so his impeachment was a good move by Wubbzy, Pr1ce and IG.
9) I think it’s fine for now
10) If it’s extreme like WN and people who threaten others then yes.

11) Hopefully we can converse somewhat regularly about current problems and controversy on the stream; whoever the president will be, hopefully we can work well.
12) I think it’s fine for now but perhaps we can add some sort of senate sometime in the future. Just an idea I guess.
13) Yes definitely. It encourages fairness and a broader opinion on certain topics.

14) Yes that’s one of my minor concerns after seeing Richard and a few others being blatantly obvious about alt accounts.
15) If it’s by a banned user, yes. Alt accounts that are showing that it’s a regular active user on the stream is fine in my books.
16) Mostly just the way they speak, suspicious accounts that immediately go to the IP stream when they first join. Stuff like that.

17) For now, the system is pretty good. But ranked voting seems to make more sense to me personally. Envoy said we’d test it out and that’s fine by me. We’ll just have to see what the President and VP will do after the election.
18) Neutrality is a major part in Inter-Stream conflict because that could push people into decisions they might not agree with.
19) I’m really trying to be active recently so yes that’s a guarantee.
20) I’m really not sure tbh. I think I’d include more polls of some sort and get a general idea of what people want on the stream to make it more fair but also fun :D

21) Best think would probably be the efficiency and solid foundations and rules of the stream. Worst thing would maybe be the random people declaring they’re running for president and then just leave.

22) That I’m very welcome to ideas and suggestions about the stream. I’ve also been here for a long time ( I think around DrStrangmeme times) so I have experience. And I really like this stream I guess.

Wow I’ve written a lot lol. Well there it is, can’t wait for everything to take place but in the meantime I think we should appreciate Wubbzy, Pr1ce and IG’s authority (since it’s a good combo)

1. To try and feel the adrenaline rush of running for a political place before taking up the big role of running for president.
2. To be honest, I haven’t thought of that yet.
3. Probably the alliance with the AAA.
4. Surly, Sugas, Jeffy (EYM’s Presidental candidate) and Uno.

5. I’m for it. Everyone deserves an opinion, even if it is someone like the AAA’s chef.
6. WN: Yes, MM: Who? I heard he was Waldo so yes.
7. If they are a serious troll like WN or send death threats like Firestar, yes.

8. He deserved it.
9. Uhhh, it’s okay, I guess but I think it should just be a congressional vote with approval from the President.
10. If they were someone like Richard or WN, then yes.

11. I’m not sure.
12. It’s fine as it is. I think we could use a senate though,
13. No, but like for 12, we could use a senate.

14. Not anyone that is obvious because we all know Richard’s known for his alts.
15. Yes, it could ruin voting, like let’s say RUP lose by 1 point to Kaiju when it was their HOC’s alt who did the deciding vote.
16. You can’t unless you shake them down for evidence.

17. I think our current system is stable enough but if it comes down to a tie, we should remove the other nominees from the ballot and do a re-vote with the tied.
18. I’ll take into consideration what is going on, if I can help it, remain neutral but if it’s blatantly obvious which is the good side, I’ll take that side.
19. Yes, maybe go missing for 1-2 days but that’s it.
20. I don’t know, I’d have too much power I wouldn’t know what to do with it. Maybe add a few new updates like banning toxic users for a day for posting toxic comments, but I honestly don’t know.
21. Best thing, the competitive nature of the elections. Worst thing, allying with the AAA.

22. It’s my first time in elections but if elected, I’d be running alongside our current HOC so despite being new, he could give me advice on how to be a good HOC.

lmao im already in congress

Next election, Sugas. Next election.

ohh lol

Speaking of which, prepare to vote on an extended RichardChill24 ban after the trial finishes.

Kk

Here: https://imgflip.com/i/5h8gvw

Luigi ruled Richard guilty in the trial.

Didn't touch PRESIDENTS today. Oops.

1) I really want to have a big lead up to a big spot in this stream, I'd really love to be president or VP for the next two elections for the biggest party I support.
2) I'd try to acommodate to the current situations on PRESIDENTS, so I don't know yet.
3) Like Mr. F1 said, the AAA was a problem and I think that alliances with other streams that love to have beef are a bad idea.

4) Wubbzy, (since he's not running for third term, I'm not sure if he doesn't want to be in Congress either, though.) 123gamer, SuGaS, and probably Surly too.
5) Moderate. As long as it doesn't harass/cyberbully/too far gone trolling (like WN), I think everyone should express what they think. (except if it harms someone else in whatever way.)
6) Definitely. Their level of trolling is too far gone. WN definitely deserved it and MoonMan too for supporting WN along.

7) With extreme levels of mentioned in 5, yes.
8) Trolled. Deserved.
9) Should be Short & Sweet. We have to handle it carefully, but quickly as well.

10) Again, with extreme levels of something wrong, yes.
11) I would work and follow what I think is right, but also consider what other people think as well. I wouldn't want my term as HOC to be completely me.
12) It's good, people know what they're doing and what position they have.

13) Yes! Freedom of Speech is necessary instead of only the president, VP, and HOC. We need second thoughts sometimes, so Congress is where we turn to.
14) No, not really.
15) No, I don't think it should be illegal as long as you're not exploiting any of the rules with them in the stream.

16) You really can't get them for 100% sure unless they confess, but we can't shake them into a false confession either.
17) Main Parties are the first on the ballot, and Independents are write-ins. I really like the current layout of voting, though.
18) We have to have a plan beforehand and I think that's the best way to approach any sort of wars or conflicts.

19) Definitely. I'm not turning into a LaChancla as an HOC.
20) Well, probably what the current owner is doing, because it's so far good.
21) The excitement of running as president and the adrenaline of waiting for the election period, it's great. But how some normal people turn corrupt just because of a roleplay stream...
22) I genuinely want to do a good job and be truthful to my statements. Thank you.

On 5, moderate means on Censorship, didn't realize.

1.I wanted to do good for this stream and I think this is the way to do it

2.it will depend on what is happening at the time but I will make sure that congress protects the rights of the people

3.the problems with the creator of this stream messing with our politics

4.Pollard and a few other RUP members

5.I f**king love free speech!!! censorship can go f**k themselves

6.yes

7.yes but only VERY rarely

8.I was a big part of it so I don’t think I have to go into detail on that

9.it’s good but too long

10.I am willing to if needed

11.I will use the partnership to to keep this stream alive and thriving

12.I think it works well for what it is meant to do

13.yes

14.I used to but not anymore

15.yes

16.if they admit it or if there is enough evidence that proves it without a shadow of a doubt

17.the current system is simple and good but if somehow a different one like a ranked voting system could be used I would like that

18.I would stay with this stream to the best of my ability

19.yes this is one of the only streams I ever go to

20.I would probably give it to someone who was better at handling a website

21.the best is the community and the worst is the controversy’s

22.I have grown up a lot since the last election

Meme chat me pls imgflip.com/memechat?invite=jMaFjILgVmTeJFS_jwP13EvQP2OzgzEW