listen to my reasoning before you say your assumptions (ahhhh i accidentally submitted under 'fun')

I am confusion

I couldn’t care less on people’s views on 9/11, but you seemed to actually want to talk about this so I wanna hear some evidence. I’m intrigued.

alright after extensive research i will state my evidince in single point comments

1. If you look at the way the buildings fell when the plane hit, you can see the explosions going from the top floor down in sort of a ripple. A plane cannot do that because the force would only be in the impact area leaving only a minimal reipple effect ratehr than a large one scaling down the building. The only way that the ripple could have been produced was if there was explosives set in the building before the impact. Who would have set the building in the building. The only people who have that kind of access are people in charg, otherwise known as the government.

But Osama Bin Laden could’ve had a guy working for him on the inside.

Ah but thats where you are wrong. Osama was a registered CIA agent under the name of 'Tim Osman'. And he had been on the FBI's watchlist for a much longer time. So why would the government take him in the CIA when he was on the watchlist.Tim Osman was his CIA nickname and was still known by his real name at the time, even when he entered. So if Osama was in teh CIA under his original identity and was still on a watchlist, then it had to be a hoax becasuse which typr of people can join the CIA? Trusted American citizens and spies. And before you say Osama was born in Saudia Arabia and all taht stuff, remember who controls the mainstream media. Big, big organizations who get their permits and permissions from who? The US government. Its all a big loop and traces back to one thing. The lies of the government.

Who truly knows how much the government tells us, got anything else? This is really interesting man.

yeah i got more, so the US says that Al-Qaeda did 9/11. Now lets look at Al-Qaeda and settle the facts. So Al-Qaeda is basically in the middle east, where the airspace is controlled by the US for 'security reasons. Now for the 'hijackers' to learn how to properly fly a plane, they would neeed to flya physical jet to train rather than use a simulator. But how would the so called 'terrorists' be able to fly a plane in restricted airspace without a rpoper permit and with the strict US policies and security. And lets even say that they learned how to fly a plane from simulators and books. How would they be able to have the perfect positioning and skills to flya plane into a building when they are flying an actual jet for the first time? This question has also been brought up to many pilots and they all agree that trying to fly a plane into a building at a very high speed and at such at altitude is near impossible without the perfect training and conditions and is like hitting a needle with a dart on your first try. But these were just hijackers from the middle east, how could they have the training when even to them its restricted. Just something to think about.

Maybe they meant to pull up while practicing and then the second guy though that number one knew what he was doing.

Sorry I’m f**ked up

Very interesting though.

Alright, next?

I’m down