if a sit provides public service, they can not violate or restict the consituition of human rights

I agree but honestly they go far beyond providing a service. They control the global narrative on FACTS.

yep. snowflakes everywhere, i am tired of all the bs, thats gose on

also like to add that the goverment can not attack websits or what people post beacuse its aginst human rights of freedom of expression and speach. thus. neather side should have the right,
we should be cencored free, and able to do as we plase on web regardless of how valger it is

now for anime cartoons and drawling of say lolis porn, you can ban it, why, beacse then family guy, would be baned, and amarican dad and south park as well, beaces we see wittny, kissing stan

we also see kenny die, also we see lots of cartoons and animes, that have uderage people kiss,

and lots of great storys are made, but their are things like baku no pico. we can ban it, for well fictaional beings, have no age, for example, i can make a adult looking woman and say shes 9 years old, i can then say that a short flat woman 4 foot, is 99 years old, but looks 16 .
further more, an argument can be made that, they actually a dwarf syndrom basically people that are deformed and have growth issues,

also they could be flat or big chested,

thus fictional characters no matter what can not be sub jected to human right laws, no mater how bad it is, beacuse its its a drawling and expresion of a individual persons right to do so,

all we can do , is find out who the chreator is, and never agin support them and so on, .

finally. i have grammer issues so f**k off grammer nazis