Except in this case. There are a lot of people who have researched this and found that there was massive voter fraud.
So that is already out there and can be examined.
Why the other side needs to prove there was no voter fraud is because we have done the leg work and all they are doing is just denying it. You can deny it all you want but you cannot say that you have proof until your side does the leg work like we did.
Either you do the leg work or shut up (and I don't mean you specifically, I mean the generic you as in your side). It is just annoying to have the proof right there a dozen times over and in each state and your side won't even look at it. All your side does is deny that there is any proof and then try to tell us it has been debunked. NO IT HASN'T Denial is not debunking.