Google vs. Bing; Part 1

I just want to refute two parts of your claim. While Wikipedia is sometime not reliable, it is actually quite accurate most of the time because you have many people contributing to the information on the website.
Secondly, water is wet, and you insinuated that it isn't, but it is. If you dump water on something, it gets wet. If you dump water on it, it doesn't change, so it must be wet.
Boom, roasted.

First, that is the point I am trying to make. Bing is right sometimes. Second, water isn't wet, it just comes in contact to make something wet.

Also, you can also find both sides of this ridiculous argument on Google. There are articles on Google that claim water is wet.
Search engines are not the object in question. They just find the information that is out there on the Web. All search engines work the same way, they use the words you type to find the best results applicable to your search. It isn't inherently wrong, but if you disagree with the first result, just scroll down a few to find the answer that makes you feel good.

Chillllllllllllll, it supposed to be meant as a joke

You said to never trust Bing, Why would you say that when "Bing is right sometimes."
Second, if you pour water on a shirt, it gets wet. If you pour water in a bucket of water, no change happens. So it must already be wet. I have extensive background in chemistry and chemical engineering. I would hope I know what I'm talking about.

"hope"

you guys dont make sence

whaaaat

😉

i dont get your guys conversation like nahh