Freedom has been restored to the galaxy...

LOL you have no f**king idea what the 'empire' is, do you.

MAGAts, my boy.

You do realize that the empire is actually the good guys, they stopped a bunch of people who kidnapped children, and they brought balance to the force by killing almost all the jedi so there was a somewhat even amount of jedi and sith

You do realize it was the Empire who had military occupation, kills their own officers and soldiers, mercilessly slaughters rebels by the hundreds, stripped entire planets for resources, destroyed their own planets at the wish of the emperor, kidnapped and eliminated force-sensitive children, sterlized geonosis, became involved in slavery (see wookiees), destroyed Jedha, Scarif, and vaporized Alderaan.

Even so, according to the novels, no child was taken against their will by the Jedi.

The empire though... they eliminated force sensitive children; killed them.

I suppose even bad guys think they're the good guys.

they believe in making an example, there is no traitors if they are too scared to betray them, what do you do when people attack you, you kill them, they want war with you, you kill in war, stripped planets for their military, they needed it for their military because of the rebels wanting war, destroyed alderaan, which housed many, many rebels, helps end the war. they are balancing the force, they say that there can only be two sith at a time, so to balance it, there can only be two jedi, jedha was also a hotspot for rebels, and they had to test out their weapon, so that was the ideal place for it. scarif had a lot of information that the rebels could have used against the empire, such as the death star plans, so they destroyed it because they were losing control of it. according to the movies, anakin was never allowed to visit his mother, even though he wanted to, and they said that he could, sounds like kidnapping.

If we're going by the film, it was clear the mom knew she wasn't going to be seeing her son much if at all anymore. He was basically becoming a Buddhist monk.

He wanted to go visit her, but they wouldnt allow him to, that is keeping someone against their own will

LOL...and you're the 'resistance' that is in line with big tech, msm, media conglomerate and all the fortune 500 companies...bwhahahaha

hahaha, he has a bacteria eating his brain hence the screen name hahaha.
He wasn't born with a peanut in his cerebellum.

Nah, it means I eat brains, and when I talk to you I usually end up starving...

I doubt you've talked to me more than a trio of times. But being someone who eats brains maybe you don't realise you're a zombie hahaha.

"QAnon Conspiracy theories. You'll never find a more retched hive of tinfoil and batshit crazy."

Where did I mention Q?
You're fkn mental, I'm gonna leave it at that.

I'm sorry you were just spouting their talking points. I had you dialed in as a Qtard.

You do understand that the only reason why Trump was against all of these business entities is because they refused to stand behind his bullsh*t right? Trump was all cool with Fox until a couple of their news anchors started calling him out on wrong things he was doing then suddenly he's talking in his rallies about how he doesn't know about Fox news anymore. Trump has a very me vs them mentality no matter what he's doing, no matter how f*cked up it is, if you don't play ball his way he'll demonize you. And all his followers blindly jump on board like the lemmings they are.

If you weren't so f**king libtarded, you'd know that 'these business entities' you alluding to, loved him (and his bullshit) until the moment he came down the escalator. It's not Trump, it's anyone who does not adapt to wokeness which is shoved down our throats through everything I listed above, msm, conglomerates, big tech and fortune 500's.

Right, the Jedi are the side of supressing opposing views and forcing uniformity in thought...

"No, I'm saying that modern christians aren't out to kill the gays."

Some* modern christians aren't out to kill the gays. Hang on, need to rephrase that to be mostly true.
Some* American** Modern Christians aren't out to kill the gays. Well, that's not really fair either.
Some* American** Modern Christians are*** out to kill the gays. We should really be more generous...
Some* American** Christians**** are*** out to kill the gays.

Do you see the issue here?

The issue is that you make up a very small demographic of the Christian community. Hell, there are people that aren't even Christian that want to kill people of the LGBTQ+ community.

But we've gone down a long road to find a goose holding a red herring.

The Empire has always been about ruling through military might, xenophobia, nationalism. Also, the suppression of free thought, intellect, liberal arts and more. These two images ring home a little too much for the Democrat party. They are totally the rebels here.

Your words "The Jedi are the side of suppressing opposing views and forcing unicormity in thought."

Please see image on the left. Then repeat your words outloud again.

When I said, "Right, the Jedi are the side of suppressing opposing views and forcing uniformity in thought," that was verbal irony, not that you'd know what that is. I was saying that is what the empire does, and they are the tactics of the left. The left doesn't even agree with free speech! If that's not suppression of opposing views, what is!?

Also, where does, "Some* American** Christians**** are*** out to kill the gays," come from? How many do you mean by "Some*" 10? 15? If they believe in killing them, that is separate from christianity. We may believe it wrong, but what's worse is taking away someone's agency or killing someone!

The Empire demands conformity. The Right wing seeks to make USA a Christian nation. They wouldn't be caught dead allowing this country to be majority Jew or even Muslim if it happened organically. Hell, they're pissed off enough that there's a growing majority of agnostics/atheists.

The left doesn't care what you do/practice, provided that it doesn't interfere with their personal rights. We totally endorse free speech. We're all about free speech.

Any White Supremacist Group, extremist Christian, Alt-Right group. They're against it.
Westboro baptists desecrate the graves of our fallen soldiers saying that God let them die because we allow homosexuality in our country.
The issue here that this is done "In the name of God." Where the bible is as corruptible as those who read it. Revisions are made over and over again to suit the times, rather than to be true to the word, whatever that may be. Christianity is just the brakes of society which pushes for progressive ideas for fear of the boogeyman called Satan.

1. No, we aren't trying to make it a Christian nation. We strongly believe in religious freedom. Part of Christianity is that everyone has agency and can make choices for themselves.

2. Are you really going to claim the left is for free speech!? They are demanding any social media that allows free speech gets shut down and any right-leaning news gets shut down!

3. Small fringe groups do not speak for the whole right or all of Christians. White Supremacists or alt right groups are shunned by both sides. Also, while most christians would agree that they believe homosexuality is wrong, most of us are not against it being legal since that takes away religious freedom, and it doesn't hurt anyone. Also, the Catholic Church of the middle ages does not represent us.

Sounds like something the Sith would say.

How does the right supress opposing viewpoints? How do we force uniformity in though?

You focus your policies around Christianity. Not for the moral reasons of it, but simply its the low hanging fruit for votes. That's how the right has always voted. "Who can support Christianity more?"

Our morals are judeo-christian, since we believe those to be right. Loving your neighbor, not stealing or killing, treat others with decency, etc.

restricting liberties on reproductive rights with women, calling gays abominations, forcing gender identity.... Should I go on?

1. It's not one's right to kill another person

2. We don't call gays abominations. We believe it is wrong, but none of God's Creations are abominations.

3. "Gender identity" is a recently made up concept trying to say that Male and female don't really exist. A man cannot be a woman, no matter what he may think. And, relating to Christian values, saying you were born in the wrong body is saying God messed up, and you are trying to change your soul.

1. Fetus are not defined as people.

2. People in the Christian Community are vehemently against LGBTQ+ and often cite these verses, thus shaping the argument in the political arena against LGBTQ+:

"Abominations"
‘You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination’
Leviticus 18:22
‘If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them’
Leviticus 20:13
"Burn in hell for eternity"
‘...just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire’
Jude 7
"Kill them."
‘For this reason God gave them up to dishonourable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error’
Romans 1:26-27
"Never receive God's light so long as you are LGBTQ+"
‘Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God’
1 Corinthians 6:9-10
"It's against the law."
‘The law is not laid down for the just but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who strike their fathers and mothers, for murderers, for the sexually immoral, men who practise homosexuality, enslavers, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine’
1 Timothy. 1:9-10

Taken from here:
https://www.livingout.org/resources/articles/18/what-does-the-bible-say-about-homosexuality

""Gender identity" is a recently made up concept trying to say that Male and female don't really exist. A man cannot be a woman, no matter what he may think. And, relating to Christian values, saying you were born in the wrong body is saying God messed up, and you are trying to change your soul."
Actually, turns out that people have been this way and have been for a long time. Only recently did they feel safe enough to come out and say it.

Thanks psychology!

See, your stances, are what you're trying to impose on the rest of us. Stop.

1. No, democrats do not define a fetus as a human, but most real biologists agree that life starts at conception.

2. It says the sin is an abomination, not the person who commits it. Also, at that time, God's law was more accepted in human law, which is why there were stricter rules about sin.

Sure, it's "alive." in the sense that it has living cells in it. But most agree that it does not have sentience until around half way through the pregnancy. Until the CNS is developed.

So, you're saying the rules about sin are more lax now? That they can be re-interpreted based on subjective disposition to the era in which they're interpreted?

No, I'm saying that modern christians aren't out to kill the gays.

And that sounds like something a jedi would say

"At least a sith tries to balance the force,
>> So Order 66 was balancing? Seemed like to me he wanted to get rid of all of them.
Bad argument. Bad!
which was said to be the goal of the jedi, would a jedi say that a sith would say that jedi are suppressors, yeah they would
>> As Sith seek to enslave, exterminated, and exploit.
Always consensual, it starts out consensual, but then the jedi dont let them go anywhere without specific orders to do something at that place,
>> If Jedi are dissatisfied with their life, they may take the Barash Vow and leave the Jedi Order. An order you're free to decline their invitation, and at any time you are free to leave.
even if the person resists against them, I specified this before. You provided zero examples that I had not already disproven. Stop repeating this stuff, it gets us nowhere"

>> Your "refutes" are garbage as are your arguments. Don't mess with me my guy, Star Wars is kinda my thing :D

Yeah, two sith, not all jedi would die, force is more balanced. "Leave the order" you got yourself there, did the child know that they couldn't go places by their own will, no, and to remove yourself from the order means that they have no power over you anymore but they also won't teach you anymore, so they control everything about everything that they have power over, but they will only bend the rules if the thing that wishes to bend them leaves their power, sounds like it is kidnapping. Star wars does seem to be your thing, but not logic

All Jedi were intended to die. Yoda, Obiwan. Yep, all of them. Don't try to rewrite what happened. It was intended to be only Sith.

Not every youngling made it into the order, very few passed their trials. The children knew by the time they were no longer younglings, that it is a life of discipline, hard work, and dedication. If that's not the life for them, then they are free. What, you want communist jedi that they share all of their teachings? Jesus man. Pick a side!

It's kind of hard to have "logic" when you can't even form complete sentences. I mean, sentence fragments galore, run-on sentences, excessive use of commas! I can't tell what you're really trying to say. Maybe writing isn't your thing? Or is it English?

No matter, children are always free to leave. They know what it means to be a Jedi. The Jedi have proven that not everyone can be trusted with the powers of the force. They guarded that power, and only freely trained those who wielded it, and gave apprenticeship to those who were found emotionally ready to handle that power. If they were found unstable, their tenure with the Order ended at being a padawan.

Stop. Just stop. You can't win this one. I recognize that the Jedi are hypocrites, but they are not inherently evil as the Sith are. Sith enjoy pain and giving pain to others. Their very creed is about the subjugation of the force.

Well, I can say that at least a jedi doesn't have to force a Kyber crystal to bleed to make it red. At least jedi don't torture their apprentices. At least Jedi don't kill their own officers to make a point. I could go on about how evil the sith are though. The Jedi may be hypocrites as so are the sith, but the sith are truly evil.

Can you imagine a Jedi fully practiced in the light deciding to slaughter a room of younglings?

if the sith kidnapped children, they probably would

If? They do. They also just slaughter entire towns full of children and their families. Seriously? Does Cult45 have you brainwashed that hard where you're actually trying to defend the Empire as being good and the Jedi as being bad? Lucas didn't design their outfits to look like Nazis for now reason. Come on now.

Do you have the name or number of the comic where they slaughtered town's full of children and their families?

You're looking for references in Alderaan places.

As I said, it was a hotspot for rebels, any other references of them slaughtering towns

Look up Taris while you're at it.

They destroyed a planet. Multiple planets, actually:
Thanta Ziibra Moon 1 & 2, Hordon Cal, Alderaan, Despayre, Moon of Kessel, Byss, Da Soocha, Hirsi, Krinemonen, Oblis, Three surrounding planets of Primus Goluud, Cron Cluster planets, Every planet in the carida system, Eol Sha and so very many more...

I will look into those planets

Or maybe Revenge of the Sith? A lot of minors in that building, not just younglings (3-10 years old)

All training to be a jedi

Indeed to which this comment backs:
"Well, I can say that at least a jedi doesn't have to force a Kyber crystal to bleed to make it red. At least jedi don't torture their apprentices. At least Jedi don't kill their own officers to make a point. I could go on about how evil the sith are though. The Jedi may be hypocrites as so are the sith, but the sith are truly evil.

Can you imagine a Jedi fully practiced in the light deciding to slaughter a room of younglings?" (I said this)

This comment that supports "Or maybe Revenge of the Sith? A lot of minors in that building, not just younglings (3-10 years old)" (I said this)

Is in reference to...

"And that sounds like something a jedi would say" (what you said)

So what does this mean?

I accused you of being a sith,
you said that's something a jedi would say...
I asked, would a jedi fully trained in the light kill younglings?
You said if sith kidnapped children they probably would...

I see the disconnect!

Did you know the Jedi never kidnapped children? It was always consensual!
Sidious though, he was big on kidnapping..

Let's proceed...

So blue said... stuff about being brainwashed defending the empire, etc...
you asked for where children were slaughtered...
I provided examples..

In short? You admit to being sith, and the Democrats being Jedi...

Glad we could get back on track.
Meme holds true.

At least a sith tries to balance the force, which was said to be the goal of the jedi, would a jedi say that a sith would say that jedi are suppressors, yeah they would. Always consensual, it starts out consensual, but then the jedi dont let them go anywhere without specific orders to do something at that place, even if the person resists against them, I specified this before. You provided zero examples that I had not already disproven. Stop repeating this stuff, it gets us nowhere