Adam just hanging around while he sees his wife being tempted by a talking snake

HahaMerrySoMerry is like: I READ NOTHING (especially not the Bible, nor the very stories of which I love to smear my lame comments + my stupid MEME which is as unfruitful and uninteresting as it is unintelligent and unoriginal, as dull and stale as an old biscuit, and of complete lack of insight. How unpleasant and unMerry I am...! ), I KNOW NOTHING!

Where???

WHERE I ASK???

WHERE???

Where does it say: "Adam just hanging around while he sees his wife being tempted by a talking snake"

WHERE I ASK???

Genesis 3:6
He did not protest when he saw that she had been deceived. He simply ate. I had no intention of slandering the Bible.

Nice try movin' the goal-post there... Buddy.

"He did not protest when he saw that she had been deceived..."

is NOT the same as:

"Adam just hanging around while he sees his wife being tempted by a talking snake"

Besides they are both INCORRECT!

"Adam just hanging around...while he sees his wife being tempted...by a talking snake..." is just plain doctrinam incorrecta.

Perhaps Adam did not protest because:

A.) He wasn't present when the serpent A.K.A.: "talking snake" deceived her. Or else the serpent wouldn't have pulled that crap on his wife (the weaker vessel [I Peter 3:7]).
B.) Perhaps...He (Adam)... ate of the tree... on purpose... Knowing what God would do to her... Because he was the FIRST "Christ" (Hintity Hint Hint... Romans 5)
C.) Genesis 4:25, Romans 5, I Corinthians 15:22, I Corinthians 15:45, I Timothy 2:13-15

I Timothy 2:14 couldn't be more plain...

READ the chapter. THEN comment on it!

Capice?

LoL

Pardon the sarcasm, plz don't take personam...

Listen, you keep talking as if I were a heretic. I am a Christian and I read the Bible regularly. I may be mistaken but we all are sometimes. Adam did indeed sin. Romans 5:14. Christ did not. For we all sin and fall short of the glory of God. Adam was NOT deceived. 1 Timothy 2:14 But he did sin by eating the fruit. Even if his wife did it first. That is why he should have known better. But we all would have done the same thing in the circumstances because we are all human and only Jesus Christ was perfect. And yes I read all of the verses and their surrounding context. Please know, I may be mistaken but I am not trying to deceive anyone.

I apologize for my arrogance my Brother in Christ. I just really dislike the (even perceived) twisting of scripture. (Especially in MEME form lol...)

Also, I recently ended another (unrelated) and much more "heated" argument with another Brother.

I didn't realize that I may have been blinded by my own haughtiness and perhaps also in possible violation of:

Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; (II Timothy 3:3,4)

and

Be not deceived: evil communications corrupt good manners. (I Corinthians 15:33)

- I never considered you to be a heretic. of this I promise. I thought you were a God hater, or Atheist!

- Also, you have correctly addressed a few important points that I forgot: Adam did indeed sin. Romans 5:14. Christ did not. TRUE

- Adam was NOT deceived. 1 Timothy 2:14 But he DID sin by eating the fruit. TRUE

- I forgot to mention also that Adam, being a type of "first" Christ, Adam, I believe, may have attempted (foolishly) to "save" his wife from the wrath of God. Adam was the "first" Christ because of his display of LOVE (even if misguided) for his wife. God, being just, had to give both of them the "boot" of judgement, since he clearly said he would if they disobeyed his commandments/instructions (Interesting, is that there was only ONE rule in his garden. Don't eat of the tree!). God however, was (perhaps) impressed by the display of LOVE that Adam clearly had manifested for his wife, that God vowed to provide for them a plan of redemption: A "second", even "better" Christ Version 2.0!

In part, I believe God warned of the dangers of sin and also, he was subtly revealing in a hazy, shadowy image, part of his ultimate plan for the redemption of his people of which God and his Son had together planned since the foundation of the world!

Praise the Lord!

I completely understand, brother. I was wondering about making memes about scripture before and now I will be much more careful what I post. Also, I think you learned a good lesson about judgment today. Maybe this could have been avoided if you had posed the question in a different way. If the tongue is hard to bridle, I must say the thumbs are probably harder! Especially when you cannot see who you are talking to in order to see how to respond.

Yes, I love how God continuously is weaving the gospel story throughout the Old Testament. Like when they had to kill a lamb in order to make garments to cover themselves. I never thought off Adam in that perspective before (him sinning just to be with his wife). If you are willing for me to explain my reasons now I would be happy to discuss it!

With good intentions, MerrySoMerry

Yea, Brother,

Sorry again if I was rude. There are so many godless haters of truth on this site, sometimes it's difficult to tell who's who and where they stand. Sometimes though, I can't help feeling like King David did when his enemies mocked the God of Israel and blasphemed his holy name.

David said,

"For they speak against thee wickedly, and thine enemies take thy name in vain.
Do not I hate them, O LORD, that hate thee? and am not I grieved with those that rise up against thee? I hate them with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies.
Search me, O God, and know my heart: try me, and know my thoughts:"

(Psalms 139:20-23)

Concerning Adam, I believe that by eating the fruit, being fully aware of his actions and knowing the consequences of his actions, he was saying to God, "Whatever you do to her, you're going to have to do ALSO to me..."

Remember, Adam spent a lot of time alone with God before Eve was even created. I believe it is possible that Adam may have even witnessed God as he created the animals. Adam gave a name to every animal after God had showed him each one. This I find to be so heart-warming. I can just imagine Adam be like: "OK, this one with the spots is going be called George, that one with the funny tail, his name is Roger..." LoL

Sure give any thoughts you desire. It's hours of fun to speculate about how certain maters may have taken place, those of which are not so clear in the Bible (no Scripture). As long as Christian don't wage war against each other, and dispute about things that are impossible to prove, I don't think any harm can come from this.

Peace Brother

:P