IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
THE JUDICIAL POWER SHALL EXTEND TO ALL CASES, IN LAW AND EQUITY, ARISING UNDER THIS CONSTITUTION, THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES, AND TREATIES MADE, OR WHICH SHALL BE MADE, UNDER THEIR AUTHORITY;...--TO CONTROVERSIES TO WHICH THE UNITED STATES SHALL BE A PARTY;--TO CONTROVERSIES BETWEEN TWO OR MORE STATES;--BETWEEN A STATE AND CITIZENS OF ANOTHER STATE;--BETWEEN CITIZENS OF DIFFERENT STATES;--BETWEEN CITIZENS OF THE SAME STATE CLAIMING LANDS UNDER GRANTS OF DIFFERENT STATES, AND BETWEEN A STATE, OR THE CITIZENS THEREOF, AND FOREIGN STATES, CITIZENS OR SUBJECTS. ARTICLE III, SECTION II; THE SUPREME COURT SHALL HAVE APPELLATE JURISDICTION, BOTH AS TO LAW AND FACT, WITH SUCH EXCEPTIONS, AND UNDER SUCH REGULATIONS AS THE CONGRESS SHALL MAKE. SO WHY CAN'T CONGRESS TELL THE SUPREME COURT TO HEAR TEXAS VS PA?
