You are what you do in the dark.

https://www.air.tv/watch?v=uea3dXi6R4CdzPWFHLJRuQ

https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-donald-trump-georgia-media-social-media-e9a73462e39e7aa39683f0f582a6659e

"video showed regular ballot containers on wheels — not suitcases —" Nice nitpick.
The "refutation" of the AP is only someone saying "nah-huh" without evidence, as such it is a failed refutation.

"Other election workers started to pack up, Sterling told The Associated Press in an interview. They put prepared ballots back in boxes and away under a table “to close out for the night.” Members of the media and Republican observers began to leave the building too." So why did EVERYONE think that they where done for the night?

"The office said it had launched an investigation into why partisan poll observers left before scanning ended." So they don't know but made a statement of fact on the issue anyway.

"After a short period when observers weren’t present," So how many where scanned without ANY supervision? Let alone the basic amount. But the ballot watchers already left when everyone started packing up to quite for the night.

But it does support the basics of the claim being make as true while attempting to justify counting ballots without poll watchers present. And thus while trying to excuses the behavior, they confessed to it being done.

I mean, there was literally a designated observer there all night as confirmed by the Secretary of State, a Republican. Stop trying to make something out of nothing.

False as per the AP story. Stop lying. But nice try at nitpicking.

https://www.newsweek.com/fox-news-reporter-debunks-georgia-election-fraud-claims-made-tucker-carlson-sean-hannity-1552397

That didn't refute the actual claim. Heck it didn't even get the claim right at several points. The testimony also gets actions recorded directly in the video wrong, therefore that person cannot be trusted.

Ok armchair expert

So you have nothing.

https://www.wsbtv.com/news/politics/georgia-election-officials-show-frame-by-frame-what-really-happened-fulton-surveillance-video/T5M3PYIBYFHFFOD3CIB2ULDVDE/

So an article that doesn't even try to refute the claim and even disproves your previous debunking article.

You can try to gaslight me, but I guarantee you it's not going to work.

It's not my fault that reality disagrees with you. Or that your fact checks disagree with each other.

Once again, gaslighting ain't gonna work on me.

Putting a buzzword label on facts doesn't make them go away. BTW you telling me objective facts are false is gas lighting. Me offering evidence and using reason to show that you interpreting things wrong or being lied to would be basic argumentation.

https://www.healthline.com/health/gaslighting#:~:text=Gaslighting%20is%20a%20form%20of,they%20question%20their%20own%20sanity.
Gaslighting is a form of emotional abuse that's seen in abusive relationships. It's the act of manipulating a person by forcing them to question their thoughts, memories, and the events occurring around them. A victim of gaslighting can be pushed so far that they question their own sanity.

I mean you quite literally are gaslighting me. You’re attempting to make me question reality by insisting my sources are contradictory or don’t “try to refute the claim” even though they literally did. That’s gaslighting.

Unless they literally didn't refute any claim at all and factually contradicted themselves. And it is your sources that you should question, because reality doesn't give a damn what either of us think.

Good thing the “unless” scenario never happened.

Except it did, I bother to show it the first couple time before you dropped back into your struggle session tactics rather than debating.