Remember kids, admitting to any voter fraud means Trump automatically wins the election.

"Remember kids, admitting to any voter fraud means Trump automatically wins the election."

Um................what??????????

Some people scream no fraud over and over and then scream that Trump lost to back up the claim, as if they link the two.

Huh...the people who scream no fraud don't have to back up their claim. Usually, they're responding to idiots like you who unironically believe the election is stolen. The burden of proof is on you to prove it, not the other way around. Plus, it's undeniable that fraud has occurred in the 2020 election. It happens every election. The question is how much fraud. And the fraud in the 2020 election, just like every other one, is so astronomically small that it will not impact the results of the election.

They usually scream it in response to proof of fraud. As you say, fraud does happen every election, but when people cannot admit to any fraud at all, they are acting in a partisan manner in conflict with reality.

Almost no one is saying that exactly 0 cases of fraud occurs. Of course it happens. What most people do say is that the rate of voter fraud is so astronomically tiny that it will not even remotely impact the results of the 2020 election.

Except the ones that do. Also https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XH9ihoLi1NA

Haha

https://williamsrecord.com/2020/11/professor-of-mathematics-steven-miller-issues-legal-statement-suggesting-ballot-irregularities-in-pa-conclusions-repudiated-by-statisticians-and-political-scientists/

That's

https://www.berkshireeagle.com/news/local/williams-prof-disavows-own-finding-of-mishandled-gop-ballots/article_9cfd4228-2e03-11eb-b2ac-bb9c8b2bfa7f.html

Funny

https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/1329794014246268928

The repudiation boils down to, well the data must be wrong based off an I believe statement. "He stopped short of directly critiquing the data that Braynard collected." It also fails to address the points in the video as well as well as it addresses a Nov. 17, 2020 affidavit, so you refuted the wrong argument.

Here's the actually "refutation" that doesn't even address the presentation. https://williamsrecord.com/2020/11/a-rebuttal-to-steven-millers-report-on-pa-gop-mail-in-ballot-requests/