Lol that guy burnt a church i thought they would be against it

Because "criminals" are good and "heros" are evil.

Not surprising.. Those "Heros" are all white guys.
... All the other "heros" were shot on sight... That's why there's "Criminals"

since when is having arms a bad thing. also who tried to kill democratic politicians

Omg! Orange KoolAid !

lmfao imagine deflecting that hard... sad

Ever since Trump was beaten. Only the Right Wing crazies are left on the flip.
So orange KoolAid is an appropriate term for what we are forced to deal with

you didnt address either of my points the only person out of the two of us who drinks orange koolaid is you

Why would I address the questions of a defeated opponent? Biden President. It’s all you need to know

lmfao "defeated opponent" then dont talk about said "opponent" and then not address their points. f**king pussy

You’re irrelevant. That’s all

if im so irrelevant why would you talk about me or people whom you think are in my party... lmfao, cant wait for a recount or more examples of blatant voter fraud

Lol

good for making fetish porn in jail

are you comparing rittenhouse to a racist church shooter who killed 12?

they fly the same sign

how so?

show me one picture of kyle brandishing a confederate flag

why is he fighting antifa then?

show me the picture of him with the flag then we can talk about that if you cant find one image then we can move on if you admit fault

if he wasn't there to defend the protesters, he was there to shoot them.

show me one IMAGE like you claimed and then i can address your points dont be so thick headed

why did the police lock him up if he did nothing wrong?

because he still killed two people (even if it was in self defense) they have to put him in jail before there are hearings in court.

open carry is illegal, 17 and working for free to protect private business is illegal. police virtually deputizing minors is illegal. being stupid is NOT illegal.

its not work, he was volunteering. also you obviously dont understand wisconsin laws because open carry is legal.

if it was likely self defense, he'd be out on bail by now.

the bail is extremly expensive and i think might have actually been raised by now to 1 million dollars.

if you don't think there's anything stupid by showing up with a gun to a protest when you're 17, helping police, then by all means do what he did and encourage your children to do the same when they are 17. and ask your local police to allow 17 year olds to open carry at protests or riots, since there's nothing stupid about it. in local jail he can be segregated and protected, he's not in prison. there is a difference.

there was a police free mandate, he brought the rifle to protect / defend protesters or to defend himself. keeping someone in jail when they havent done anything wrong is unusual / cruel punishment which is unconstitutional.

yes, it's very high bail for a variety of reasons. to send a message to other stupids who watch right wing media NOT to try some shit like this, there's also a high likelihood of him leaving the country because he COULD be politicized into a long sentence, and because setting him free could be a danger to his safety and others who might get swept up in a white militia trying to guard him who would probably instigate more shootings near his house.

i didn't say high bail was an indicator of innocence, i said it's an indicator of guilt, flight risk or safety of self or others.

open carry is NOT legal when you're 17. police will be sued for allowing him to "help".

it was self defense theres nothing stupid trying to help and defend people with opposing views or ideas and the arrest and shooting are or were being politicized, so we shouldent set him free for his own safety? you do realise in jail he probably would be much more likely to be killed, and what militia is gaurding him

also just because its high bail doesnt mean hes innocent

he explicitly said multiple times he was there to help, he also had a medical bag and on video helped an injured person.

then why did he instigate the people to come after him?

how did he do that?

i watched the entire video and they rushed towards him in a mob ontop of that there were gunshots and the people who got shot started beating him with skateboards and were trying to get his gun

why would they do that? unprovoked?

they saw he had a rifle and some random person screamed "he shot somebody" even though he did not, and a mob started to chase him and then, like i said before, started beating him.

i saw the video and it was not clear if he shot somebody or not. either way, open carry is stupid and illegal and the cops should have NEVER allowed him to "help". now he has to go through a loooong trial and others will hopefully learn not to be stupid from his mistakes. but no, this has emboldened MORE idiots to join militias to avenge him.

rittenhouse is a product of right wing media just like the others in the meme.

how is he a product of right wing media and do you mind telling me the rest of the peoples names

they were all manipulated by right wing media into taking actions they had zero business being involved in. they were brainwashed that blacks or antifa were a deadly problem. the bottom 3 killed ahmaud arbery because he did something wrong, the top right tried to kill the governor of michigan because he didn't like covid lock down.

right wing media throws dogwhistles to extremists. "soros" "blm" "riots" "murder" "crime", etc. is left wing media doing that?

how where kyle or the confederate church shooter influenced in anyway by right wing media

"how where kyle or the confederate church shooter influenced in anyway by right wing media"

The church shooter was influenced by right wing media.

Here's en excerpt from his Manifesto:

"But more importantly this prompted me to type in the words "black on white crime" into Google, and I have never been the same since that day. The first website I came to was the Council of Conservative Citizens. There were pages upon pages of these brutal black on white murders. I was in disbelief. At this moment I realized that something was very wrong."

" the Council of Conservative Citizens" Is a right wing media source. He was influenced because after stumbling across the site and watching its contents, it made him "[realize] that something was very wrong.", thus changing his world outlook and influencing him.

And? doesnt mean kyle was...

also thats an extremely small right wing media source if it was on the level of fox news then i would care, but it isnt so i dont. seeing graphic images especially if it is one race on another, that would obviously lead to racist ideas and combined with his probable mental illness it was an obvious combination set for disaster.

"also thats an extremely small right wing media source if it was on the level of fox news then i would care, but it isnt so i dont. "

You should care, as I just showed you how he was influenced by right wing media, regardless of how "extremely small" the media source is. Right wing media is still right wing media nonetheless.

"seeing graphic images especially if it is one race on another, that would obviously lead to racist ideas and combined with his probable mental illness it was an obvious combination set for disaster."

Are you drunk...?

1. just because its right wing media doesnt mean anything...

2. how so? its a pretty valid point

No, right wing does not mean republican party. In some countries the right wing party is called the democrat party, like the national democratic party of Germany

"no republican or conservative would support them."

evidence?

"not many people do, its an extremly small and extremely potent in terms of political stand points."

What does this have to do with anything?

Also, stop moving the f**king goalposts, the point of this argument was whether or not Dylann roof was influenced by a right wing media source; stop moving the goalposts and telling me to respond to whether it was an outlet or not; that's a different convo for another time

1. just because the name is changed doesnt mean that it isnt the republican party also StOP MOVInG ThE GoAL POSTS, we are talking about america not germany.

2. using your own source it is extremly far "right" due to the overton window not many would accept or support it, me saying "no(body)" would support it is a hyperbole but never theless most would not.

3. it has to do with the fact that the website dylan was on is not popular and is extreme.

4. he cant be influenced by a right wing media "outlet" if it isnt a media outlet

To be more specific, it is a media source because people get their information from there

not many people do, its an extremly small and extremely potent in terms of political stand points.

all im saying is that its small and that it doesnt really reflect many peoples views.

Also, just because someone is right wing doesn't mean they're a member of the republican party; they could be a part of a 3rd party organization or something and still be right wing

1. just because the name is changed doesnt mean that it isnt the republican party also StOP MOVInG ThE GoAL POSTS, we are talking about america not germany.

That's not moving the goalposts, that's providing an example. Also, all right wingers aren't members of the republican party. Moving the goalposts would be changing the focal point of the argument from media source/media to media outlet.

2. using your own source it is extremly far "right" due to the overton window not many would accept or support it, me saying "no(body)" would support it is a hyperbole but never theless most would not.

Evidence? It never says it's due to the overton window on the source I provided you.

3. it has to do with the fact that the website dylan was on is not popular and is extreme.
So? That doesn't take away from the fact that it was still a right wing media source

4. he cant be influenced by a right wing media "outlet" if it isnt a media outlet

Media isn't necessarily media outlet dumbass, it could be media sources or social media not media outlet

"but they are confederates, which isnt on either partys side. no republican or conservative would support them."

We're talking about them being right wing not about parties

the right wing is composed of the republican party, look up the definition of right wing.

It was right wing as well do I need to give you sources

go ahead, they were confederates, they arent on either partys side.

"they arent even a media outlet"

Their website is a form of media, though not necessarily a media outlet. Though some would argue it is a media outlet

would you argue its a media outlet

"1. just because its right wing media doesnt mean anything..."
Yes, it does. It proves the point that the church shooter was influenced by right wing media.

2. We're not talking about that; I was providing you an example of how the Church shooter was influenced by right-wing media

yes but it wasnt by a large scale netwrok so it doesnt matter as much, because if he was inspired by a big network the rhetoric would be concerning, also churchs are bypartisan.

ok.

they actually are a white supremeist group who support confederates

they arent even a media outlet

idk, this source says they're extreme right

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/council-of-conservative-citizens/

but they are confederates, which isnt on either partys side. no republican or conservative would support them.

"yes but it wasnt by a large scale netwrok so it doesnt matter as much"

Still doesn't take away from the fact that he was indeed influenced by right wing media.

"because if he was inspired by a big network the rhetoric would be concerning"
Yes, it would.

"also churchs are bypartisan."

Dylann roof was most likely republican

it was confederate media

dylan roof was confederate