Trump lawsuit, 2020 election, election, voter fraud, 2020 lawsuit

Literally none of that happened tho. His own lawyers are admitting that it's all made up.

The recent recount "found" a large amount of votes for Trump, confirming some of those claim trump brought to court.
https://www.unionleader.com/news/politics/statehouse_dome/state-house-dome-recounts-find-votes-not-fraud-in-nh/article_6f23ca8d-c5a3-59ae-b783-4f751f164244.html
https://granitegrok.com/mg_windham/2020/11/recount-in-windham-rock-dist-7-machine-shorted-every-republican-by-about-300-votes

That's the claim. But so far Trump's lawyers have been unable to find evidence that actually show a meaningful impact in the election.

Can you find a single lawsuit that.
A. Has not been dismissed b/c of lack of evidence and
B. Would actually impact the election in any meaninful way.

I cannot.

Nice job moving that goal post.

My point has always been the same. You. Don't like the sources I shared and yet you can't share anything with any credibility that Trump's cases aren't pointless and aren't being thrown out for lack of evidence.

Like your source that proved you wrong? https://www.democracydocket.com/cases/montgomery-county-board-of-elections-vote-count/

Or the last two links I gave you that don't exist because you don't like that they prove you wrong. The prove me wrong doesn't work on its own, but you do it while ignoring any evidence wrong and moving that goalpost back and forth as per "B. Would actually impact the election in any meaninful way.".

I didn't post a source that proved me wrong. You're just making stuff up now. You just posted a link to another fraudulous lawsuit based off of made up conspiracies that will have no impact on the elcection.

Sorry chump, that suit is where your quotes come from, a suit that Trump won on appeal, which proves your quoting being a out of context lie. This shows you willfully ignore evidence your wrong by putting a false label on it. 4mbxtc.jpg (click to show)

You're claim is funny. "Trump made up 20 conspiracies with no evidence, but that doesn't mean the next one will be a conspiracy with no evidence."

Well except the evidence of the people arrested for fraud that you willfully ignore and the case Trump won because he had evidence. That means he has provided evidence, and your claim is not only based off a falsehood because you willful ignore evidence that you're wrong, it based off a package deal fallacy moving forth to dismiss evidence being adjudicated right now.

Still no evidence after all this time. Guess it all turned out to be a lie.

Epic, Shaun. 😎

So is the actual Court transcript 😂

The latest, in a Pennsylvania court:
Judge: “Are you claiming there there is any fraud..?”
Trump lawyer: “To my knowledge, at present, no.”
Judge: “Are you claiming that there is any undue or improper influence upon the elector...?”
Trump lawyer: “To my knowledge, at present, no.”

In another court, Trump lawyers were conceding (as they were admitting what flimsy evidence they had) that all these supposed affidavits were mostly lies, or incapable of being corroborated. So the judge then threw out the evidence moments later.

Trump’s lawyers at the end of the day still have to respect their oath and don’t want to be disbarred for fabricating evidence.

That’s the problem when the rubber finally hits the road. Lawyers don’t want to lose their license lying for Trump and witnesses don’t want to go to jail for perjury. The few witnesses that did testify in court confessed that they didn’t know if there was any fraud and recanted in cross examination. One even laughed, admitting it was just political theater.

Attempting an anti-intellectual coup with the courts given the courts’ absolute loyalty to empiricism makes about as much sense as trying to eat chicken broth with a fork.

Wow, you still spreading that motion over a procedural issue as if it was a voter fraud claim?
Fake news is fake.

So far lawsuit has been thrown out and Trump's lawyers are withdrawing from the cases to avoid losing their licenses for making fraudulent claims. He's just throwing a tantrum.

Citation needed.

If you want to actually be informed. Here is a good summary of where we are at. https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=share&v=ha7iWECm_8E

That's not a citation.

Did you watch it? Or did you expect me to link to every single case that has been thrown out individually?

I listened to it, and that is still not a citation and it doesn't backup your claim.

Here are some lawfirm withdrawing from working with Trump over this. https://kesq.com/news/national-politics/2020/11/13/law-firm-attempting-to-block-bidens-win-in-pennsylvania-leaves-controversial-trump-campaign-case/

Doesn't actually support your case as you have no motive listed.

https://twitter.com/MattGalkaFox10/status/1327316816285245440?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1327316816285245440%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fox10phoenix.com%2Fnews%2Ftrump-campaign-drops-lawsuit-against-arizona-over-presidential-election

https://ussanews.com/News1/2020/11/13/trump-law-firm-withdraws-from-election-challenge-after-twitter-harassment-campaign-against-employees/

https://today.westlaw.com/Document/Ief147bd0247611eb8dfbdfeb7526f5c7/View/FullText.html?transitionType=SearchItem&contextData=(sc.Default)

Here is a citation that Trump's cases keep getting thrown out. https://www-nytimes-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.nytimes.com/2020/11/13/us/politics/trump-loses-election-lawsuits.amp.html?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA%3D#aoh=16053690735985&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2020%2F11%2F13%2Fus%2Fpolitics%2Ftrump-loses-election-lawsuits.html

And again, doesn't support your claim. Trump has lost at least 20 lawsuits, but that doesn't mean that pending lawsuits are going to be lost or that lost or pending have no merit. I remember one lawsuit from your video that was overturned on appeal and was misrepresented as having no evidence.

You're claim is funny. "Trump made up 20 conspiracies with no evidence, but that doesn't mean the next one will be a conspiracy with no evidence."

Here is another citation. Trump keeps getting his cases thrown out for lack of evidence.
https://www.propublica.org/article/the-trump-campaign-cant-find-a-judge-who-will-ignore-facts-but-its-trying

That is an opinion article. I looked at it and found zero citation to back the claims. As such you have failed at all three attempt at providing citations to backup your claims

you're in denial. So far every lawsuit has been found to be lacking evidence. And it is really all a waste as none of the lawsuits are significant enough to change the outcome of the election. Even if they could present a decent case with actual evidence.