Hey, I can respect that, given my own previous feelings about such loose usage of terms when it comes to "conspiracies", etc. For starters, I definitely am not alluding to any QAnon material, which many retired Intel vets say has many holes, and call out due to the fact that he/she remains anonymous, and has been wrong many times. Instead, I'm referring to bi-partisan testimony of Intel vets who are pro-Trump and anti- and who agree that is was an attempted coup and subversion of our democratic republic in how the FISA court was used, which the ongoing Durham report is looking into in greater detail. Ray McGovern, for example is anti-Trump on policy due to his convictions against certain energy policies (environment) but says that there definitely was corruption with what he has seen, combined with his knowledge of how they have operated in the past against former agents who tried to blow the whistle, including Bill Binney (check out "A Good American" on Netflix about him), whom Mr. Govern regularly speaks with in agreement on the matter. I'll attach a few references on that specifically and let you be the judge, and won't do like Don Lemon on CNN and tell you how to feel or what to believe, while avoiding interviewing such credible men and only giving the day of time to corrupt Intel guys like Brennan and Clapper, who by the way, are called out by Binney and McGovern for previous misdeeds. All the best to you, as a fellow lover of truth and freedoms for all :-)
Links: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zfysDNSYo3Q&t=1431s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mguorAYHG-s&t=1185s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQD7ILrnhh0&t=1s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dlp6Kr6QI4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngeza24IpJI&t=2040s
