They’ll take anything to pretend climate change doesn’t exist.

tucker carlson lmao

Liberal Climate change propaganda LMFAO. You fell right into that. You really are a jackass.

Wouldn't using the term 'Oh boy' be considered misogynistic to you hypocritical liberals?

How many fires have burned since the start of 2020 again?

Are you including the fires started by unhinged lefties in Minneapolis and Kenosha or just the fires started by the thirteen arsonists caught so far? Will you include new arsonists caught or are those arsonists named climate change too?

Grab a dictionary and learn the definition of a wildfire.

Grab a dictionary and learn the definition of arson. The word you used to describe the handful of thirteen arsonists caught so far

Thirteen. Look at this number carefully and closely. Now look at the number 42,000 (wildfires in the US since January 2020). My question is, which one is larger? I know I know, it's a tough question.

You still haven't answered my question, Are you including the fires started by unhinged lefties in Minneapolis and Kenosha? I know I know, it's a tough question a child can answer.

Post a link to the 42,000 wildfires in the US since January 2020. I want to see exactly where your statistics list climate change as the cause of these wildfires. I don't want a link to a liberal rag, link an independent news source.

I know it's really hard for you to believe wildfires have existed since earth was created. Were they all caused by climate change? Even the wildfires that were started before your ancestors fell out of a tree?

"You still haven't answered my question, Are you including the fires started by unhinged lefties in Minneapolis and Kenosha? I know I know, it's a tough question a child can answer."

Post a link to the 42,000 wildfires in the US since January 2020. I want to see exactly where your statistics list climate change as the cause of these wildfires. I don't want a link to a liberal rag, link an independent news source."

No I'm not. Your gotcha failed spectacularly.

https://www.nifc.gov/fireInfo/nfn.htm

And you still don't know how climate change causes wildfires. Still. Let me be really simple. Rising temperatures due to anthropogenic climate change removes moisture from the west coast, making forests drier, creating the perfect conditions for wildfires. Additionally, the rising temperatures reduces the snow pack earlier, making the wildfire season longer.

Typical liberal, copying and pasting the debate to say absolutely nothing.

It was a simple question a child could have answered, and you failed spectacularly at trying to avoid it.

Your link is to a generic Google listing on wildfires. Not one listing says climate change. You keep failing spectacularly.

And you still don't know how arson causes wildfires. Still. Let me be really simple.
Arsonists setting wildfires isn't climate change, it's arsonists setting wildfires.

I will admit, one fire was started at a gender reveal party. I know that has to piss you off for two reasons 1. it destroys your climate change narrative and 2 How dare those parents choose their child's gender.

I'll ask this question again for the completely braindead.
Were the Rising temperatures due to anthropogenic climate change removing moisture from the west coast, making forests drier, creating the perfect conditions for wildfires. Additionally, the rising temperatures reduces the snow pack earlier, making the wildfire season longer
(the reason wildfires occurred when your ancestors fell out of their tree)??

You are so brainwashed you copied and pasted talking points from a liberal climate change site. Not one of those words came from you, you bleated them like a mindless sheep.

I almost feel bad for how brainwashed you are, but you'll say you aren't brainwashed. You'll copy and paste something someone else said proving you don't have the brain power to think for yourself, you have just enough brain power to bleat what you are told.

I read through your comment and you literally had nothing of substance. Nothing of substance.

"Your link is to a generic Google listing on wildfires. Not one listing says climate change. You keep failing spectacularly."

It's a government website specifically made to track wildfires in the US. How can you be this stupid? And no shit it's not going to say climate change because guess what? THAT'S NOT WHAT THE WEBSITE IS INTENDED FOR. It's intend to track wildfires, not list the causes. And I have no idea how a generic Google listing is a bad thing. Oh no...I have committed a terrible crime of providing evidence for my claims! The horror!

"And you still don't know how arson causes wildfires. Still. Let me be really simple.
Arsonists setting wildfires isn't climate change, it's arsonists setting wildfires."

Again.......13 arsonists.......42,000 fires. 13 arsonists......42,000 fires.

"You are so brainwashed you copied and pasted talking points from a liberal climate change site. Not one of those words came from you, you bleated them like a mindless sheep."

How I know when conservatives have no counterargument is when they say "LIBEERAL LIBTARD BRRAINWASHED REEEEEE!!!!"

Too bad the science agrees with me. I'm so terribly sorry that your deficient brain is unable to process facts so you have to resort to vague genetic fallacies. Apparently deferring to SCIENTISTS is being brainwashed lmaooooooooooooo.

TLDR: you didn't refute anything I said. Anything. Not that I'm surprised.

"You posted a generic link to wildfires. Not one listing says anything in the tag about climate change. How can you be that stupid to post a link debunking your own talking points?"

Since when did my source debunk my claims? It's a record of fires that happened since January 2020. It specifically debunks YOUR claims that the wildfires were caused by arson, considering only 13 arsonists were arrested. You're like a desperate child clinging on to a toy in Walmart..

"You still haven't posted a link to the 42,000 fires. Post a link that specifically says 42,000 wildfires in 2020 were caused by climate change."

If you're talking about the literal spark to all the wildfires, then no, climate change didn't cause any of the fires. But that's not the argument I'm making. Climate change makes it so that the conditions for a wildfire starting are exacerbated. Drier ground, less snowpack etc. Climate change makes fires burn larger, more intense and for longer. This is simply undeniable.

"Your scientists are paid to tell you climate change is real. You're stupid for free."

So you're just an anti-intellectual brainlet then. Got it. It's a grand conspiracy! All the scientists with their facts, statistics and logic are all lying to all of you! I know the truth! LMAAAAAAAAAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO...what's the point arguing with you when every piece of evidence I give you will dismiss as being a liberal hoax?

You're hands down the easiest person I've argued with. Hands down. Your arguments are so f**king bad it's actually hilarious.

Again.......13 arsonists.......13 arsonists........13 arsonists....... Your own retarded Meme says Arson in it. It's right there for everyone to see. Oops my bad, I lied. Not everyone will see it, only a handful of people who read it, laughed at how stupid it is and clicked downvote see it.

You haven't said anything of substance since I destroyed your lying narrative. You copied and pasted what your were told to bleat, like a mindless sheep.

You posted a generic link to wildfires. Not one listing says anything in the tag about climate change. How can you be that stupid to post a link debunking your own talking points?

You still haven't posted a link to the 42,000 fires. Post a link that specifically says 42,000 wildfires in 2020 were caused by climate change

Your scientists are paid to tell you climate change is real. You're stupid for free.

Go back through your own idiotic comments little hypocrite. You'll see exactly where you said I was braindead before I ever said it.. I used your liberal tactics against you and copied and pasted it back to you. lmfaooooooooooooo. It must absolutely suck being you.

You didn't and couldn't refute anything I said. You kept bleating exactly what you were told. Not that I'm surprised. You can't think for yourself.

Keep telling yourself you're winning this debate. Using your own liberal logic, you lost it on your second Meme when you called me braindead, and then claimed victory when I said the same thing back to you.

You refuse to post a link to a website or article proving the 42,000 wildfires are the result of climate change. You keep babbling about nothing

You cited paid scientists as your backup.

And as usual when you've lost the debate you resorted to more name calling to prop up your failed arguments, and you laugh like a deranged fool believing you're intelligent.

You're hands down the easiest person I've argued with. Hands down. Your arguments are so f**king bad it's actually hilarious.

Keep struggling, little sheep.

Your scientists.
LMAAAAAAAAAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

10 hours in, 43 views and not one upvote. Ya, you're winning.
LMAAAAAAAAAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.

1. "Keep telling yourself you're winning this debate. Using your own liberal logic, you lost it on your second Meme when you called me braindead, and then claimed victory when I said the same thing back to you."

So if my timeline is correct, you straw manned me by claiming that I don't think it is possible for arson to be the literal spark in wildfire, which is a position I never had. Then when I called you out for that obvious strawman, you referred to another comment of mine when I said that you were braindead (tru) because you don't know how climate change works. Your first comment proves the third comment. To repeat for the 12341324th time, climate change doesn't literally start fires, but it expands the fire season and it removes moisture from the ground leading to drier forests, which are perfect conditions for fires to spread faster and more intensely. TLDR: Ur wrong

2. Anyone who refutes scientific research with "loL tHeY'rE PaId ThOuGh" doesn't have a counterargument. No shit scientists are paid. It's their f**king job.

3. Anyone who uses an appeal to popularity doesn't have a counterargument.

You skipped right over the part where you resorted to name calling. Shocker.

My first comment was the Unicorn man Meme saying exactly what your own shitty Meme said only changing Conservative to liberal while changing Climate change denial to Pushing Climate change.
You should really get a dictionary and look up the definition of Strawmam. It doesn't mean what you think it means.
My second Meme challenged your horrible math by claiming thirteen arsonists only equal a handful.
Both are true stories. They are right there for you to ignore.

YOUR FIRST reply which actually is a strawman argument was a retarded photo with your strawman comment "Exhibition #4352481343 of how braindead conservatives don't understand how climate change works"

Your next comment was another retarded Meme with another strawman comment "Grab a dictionary and learn the definition of a wildfire"
Once again it's all right there for you to ignore.

So it's Scientists job to lie about Climate change. Got it. The retarded typing shows your real intelligence.

Anyone who makes a shitty Meme and wastes their time hiding behind Strawman arguments and copied and pasted talking points written by someone else doesn't really have an argument.

Still waiting for that link.

"You skipped right over the part where you resorted to name calling. Shocker."

Anyone who denies climate change, pretends arson is the biggest cause of the wildfires, and believes the millions of scientists who dedicate their lives to science are actually all lying to you is more than deserving of being insulted. If that triggers you, I'm sorry.

"My first comment was the Unicorn man Meme saying exactly what your own shitty Meme said only changing Conservative to liberal while changing Climate change denial to Pushing Climate change.
You should really get a dictionary and look up the definition of Strawmam. It doesn't mean what you think it means."

Sorry to burst your bubble, but 13 arsonists being arrested doesn't mean climate change is a fairy tale.

"My second Meme challenged your horrible math by claiming thirteen arsonists only equal a handful."

It literally is.

"So it's Scientists job to lie about Climate change. Got it. The retarded typing shows your real intelligence."

What evidence do you have that the millions of scientists in the world are lying to all of us? Link?

"Still waiting for that link." My pleasure! But I know this is going to be a futile exercise because you're just going to pretend that all scientists are paid to lie so everything I link is false by definition, thereby avoiding using any substantive criticisms.

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2020/09/climate-change-increases-risk-fires-western-us/
https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/infographic-wildfires-and-climate-change
https://www.carbonbrief.org/explainer-how-climate-change-is-affecting-wildfires-around-the-world
https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2912/satellite-data-record-shows-climate-changes-impact-on-fires/
https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2020/08/climate-change-is-worsening-californias-hellish-wildfires/

You are so retarded you don't even know how to post a proper link. Every link you posted is to a generic google search. You are literally struggling to find a source to back up your stupidity.
It really must suck being you.
https://www.ebaumsworld.com/pictures/retarded-faces/84287169/

See this is why I'm unable to have any sort of civil discussion with people like you. I post evidence, and you just throw it away as either being all a grand conspiracy or it being a "generic google search."

Just for the record, just because a piece of evidence comes from google, that doesn't automatically make the evidence invalid. I can't believe I have to explain this to you. This is dumbest, most moronic genetic fallacy I've even seen.

You really are a moron.

You labeled a specific group in your stupid ass Meme, and now say... You people. You weren't looking for a discussion, you were looking for an argument. You came unarmed.

Your second comment on your stupid ass Meme was an ad-hominen attack against me for questioning your interpretation of a handful. Proof you were looking for an argument. And the best you could come up with was childish name calling. Absolutely pathetic.

Every link you posted is a genetic Google search link. Not one link is to a page on climate change. You are so stupid you don't know how to post a link.

And of course you use the it's a conspiracy excuse when your argument crumbled. Shocker.

Just for the record, posting a link to google doesn't make your evidence valid, posting evidence makes your evidence valid.
I'm not shocked I have to explain this to you, liberals are often confused by facts.

If you think this is dumbest, most moronic genetic fallacy you've even seen, you should stop trying to think. You aren't capable of thinking, it's why you copied talking points from someone else.

Ok....I can only handle so much stupidity in one day...

"You weren't looking for a discussion, you were looking for an argument. You came unarmed."

You commented on my image first. You put an image mocking transgender liberals on a meme about climate change and wildfires. You weren't looking for a discussion. You were looking for an argument.

"Every link you posted is a genetic Google search link. Not one link is to a page on climate change. You are so stupid you don't know how to post a link."

Wait are you f**king blind? Did you read ANY of my sources? EVERY SINGLE SOURCE WAS ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE YOU ABSOLUTE MORON. AND EVERY SINGLE SOURCE WAS A LINK BRO....WTF ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT??????!!! Do I have to educate you on what a link is and what a website about climate change looks like? Like read what you said out loud slow and clear, and then self reflect on how stupid you sound. And again, something coming from google doesn't make it invalid.

"Just for the record, posting a link to google doesn't make your evidence valid, posting evidence makes your evidence valid.
I'm not shocked I have to explain this to you, liberals are often confused by facts."

If you think my evidence is not evidence, then tell me where in any of my links does it hold incorrect information. Explain to me which sections of my sources do not support my claim. I will be happy to hear them. I will not entertain however, genetic fallacies and conspiracies. You can't just say someone's evidence is invalid because it's invalid. That's how you lose an argument.

"If you think this is dumbest, most moronic genetic fallacy you've even seen, you should stop trying to think. You aren't capable of thinking, it's why you copied talking points from someone else."

First of all, I defer to SCIENTISTS when it comes to topics about climate change. Of course I'm using talking points from SCIENTISTS, because they know about climate change way more than both of us combined. I have no clue where you get your BS from.

This is essentially your argument:

Person A: 1+1=2
Person B: Gimme a link to show that libturd.
Person A: This link from a mathematician shows that 1+1 indeed equals 2.
Person B: Silly libturd, you're copying talking points from someone else because you're incapable of thinking yourself! CHECKMATE LIBERAL!

As for the genetic fallacy, I 100% stand by what I said. Let me elaborate. A genetic fallacy is committed when someone attacks the origin of the claim rather than the claim itself. This is precisely what many conservatives do when liberals and leftists provide evidence from a left leaning site. They'll bitch and moan about "bias". This is a perfect example of the genetic fallacy, because instead of focusing on what is actually in the evidence, the conservative is attacking the origin of the claim, the source as being biased. This means you can dodge from actually addressing the substance of the source.

Your argument is like the one used by most conservatives, but infinitely dumber. When I gave evidence to back up my claim that wildfires are exacerbated by climate change, your go-to response is, “BuT iT’s A gEnEtIc GoOgLe SeArCh!” Herein lies the fallacy. Because as it turns out, where a source comes from (google, bing, facebook, twitter) is completely irrelevant to whether that source is accurate or not. If you want to challenge the veracity of my sources, you actually have to read, something you are demonstrably bad at.

We've been through this multiple times. Your scientists are paid.

Keep throwing a temper tantrum on your shitty Meme, no one likes it. No one believes your BS.

Ah you’re pulling the “I can’t actually debunk the substance of the evidence so I’m going to pretend like it’s a grand conspiracy” card.

Nice furtive fallacy.

Nice appeal to popularity. The fallacy is strong with this one.

The only thing you've proven is you're a jackass who can't Meme, Can't debate and can't stop repeating the lies you are told to repeat.

You got owned on your own shitty Meme. The proof is in your stupid comments. You're just to obnoxious and indoctrinated to see it.

You've been repeating the same crap for 2 days. Not one single user upvoted your shit Meme. Keep telling yourself you're winning when users avoided your Meme.

Addendum because you can't stop being stupid:

To clarify once again for the 121123982340983542485th time: 0 out of the 42,000 fires are LITERALLY caused by climate change. 42,000 out of the 42,000 of the fires are INFLUENCED and EXACERBATED by climate change. And for the 123948452903485720349852 time, if there are over 42,000 fires and only 13 arsonists arrested, it's pretty safe to say that arsonists have a negligible, virtually nonexistent impact on the west coast wildfires.

You really should get yourself a dictionary, you'll save yourself a lot of embarrassment.
Addendum doesn't mean what you think it means, You literally keep repeating the same lies. Addendum means an item of additional material, typically omissions, added at the end of a book or other publication.
That's the 3rd time you've gotten the definition of a word wrong. You just can't stop being stupid.

To clarify once again for the 121123982340983542485th time you have zero proof one of the 42,000 fires was caused by climate change. Zero proof one of the 42,000 of the fires was INFLUENCED or EXACERBATED by climate change. And for the 123948452903485720349852 time, if there are over 42,000 fires and only 13 arsonists arrested, it's pretty safe to say that not every arsonist was caught, not every arsonist set only a single fire and not one single fire can be proven to be from the result of climate change.

Telling the same lie over and over doesn't make your lie any less a lie, it makes you a liar.
Copying and pasting arguments from a liberal rag isn't proof either. It just shows you're a sheep who can't think for yourself, you're just repeating what a liberal smarter than you told you to bleat.

You got nothing. I'm shocked

You're stupid enough to believe this.

Rofl

Good little sheep.

Grab a dictionary and learn the definition of strawman.

What "facts and evidence?"

Exactly. You haven't listed a single fact or one piece of evidence. Just copied and pasted talking points from liberal climate change sites.

Don't look now. But your own failed Meme cites arson. It's okay. only 31 people saw you make a complete ass of yourself with this shitty ass Meme. It will be buried with the other shitty liberal Memes on this site.

May i suggest PoliticsToo for your next shitty Meme. That's where the liberal circle jerk is. You'll fit right in. A extra tip for a mentally stunted lib like yourself. Don't use Memes that say "Oh Boy on them. You'll upset the gender confused liberals.

I went through all your your Memes. This pathetic excuse for a Meme is the first time you've mentioned climate change in the 5 months you've been embarrassing yourself on this site.

You never said a word about climate change until you were told when and what to bleat. You used the EXACT words you were told to bleat. Your entire narrative was given to you by someone else. You are so mindless you even copied and pasted talking points from someone else, because you lack the ability to think for yourself.
You kept citing climate scientists, but I can guarantee you can't name a single scientist without Googling it.

You are hands down one of the dumbest most mindless sheep on this site.

This video explains you to a T. I know you'll ignore everything, you've been indoctrinated to ignore everything you hear outside your liberal bubble.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRSp_uhRhM4

Don't bother replying, You'll just repeat the same nonsense someone else told you to say. That's all you've been doing for 2 days on your dead and buried Meme.

Lmaooooooooo

It just keeps getting worse for your lying narrative.

Yeah I give up

I was looking forward to hearing more easily debunked talking points

What part of... 'Arson' in your own statement confuses you?

Exhibition #4352481343 of how braindead conservatives don't understand how climate change works.